No, you will still have decentralization with the technology, <decentralized nodes> but in a Permissioned Blockchain those nodes will all be controlled by a single entity or organization. <Like a Bank with nodes distributed in all their branches>

The public Permissionless Blockchains will be the true version of a decentralized Blockchain, because the public will host these full nodes, like it is done now.

Governments will just have two sets of rules for the different technologies. One set of rules for Permissioned Blockchains and a separate set of rules for Permissionless Blockchains. 

Actually, i dont care centralize or decentralize at all, the only question is that which one will do real help to the world development, centralize may have much problems but it can solve more problems, decentralize need to prove itself that it can do something that we truely need

If bitcoin becomes "not decentralized cryptocurrency" anymore, I don't think many people will still go with it since we all know that if bitcoin becomes controlled by government especially those corrupted once. Chances are the essence or identity of bitcoin may change or be gone forever.

'Let's not support permissioned blockchains', yet Ripple has tended to have 10%-20 of the market.

Sounds like something the government would want to do because they know that bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies takes away their ability to control the money of the masses so they need a new way to control it.

Regardless of Governments, things are already centralized even in mining where the Governments may actually involve theirs heads by diving into these companies that send miners to their users and/or ask them to take KYC of their users. Nowadays, all the ICOs ask for KYC even for an airdrop amount, and you know what? People give their documents for just a few bucks (and sometimes, even pennies). What would these ICOs do with our KYC? They will surely give them to their Government Officials to keep themselves safe and let the game going. Who is in danger now? The users who gave their KYC, be it for the purpose of some airdrop tokens or due to their investments. I would ask just 1 question to everyone out here: These Governments say that they are trying to protect us by going to REGULATE crypto. Now think twice and tell me, who are they trying to protect? Regulations will not do anything but just f*ck our asses by making us their slaves once again as this is the only thing that's our weapon to fight their all-time traditional banking systems which have been looting us since years and making rich richer, poor poorer!

The reason why bitcoin was even programmed by Satoshi Nakamoto is because its permission less. We are all supporting bitcoin because it is decentralized. We are tired of being controlled by the government or central banks. There are many of us believing in bitcoin and decentralized cryptocurrencies. We are not falling into traps for these outright attacks on bitcoin.

Thats the only way they can control permissionless blockchains, the entry and exit points.
Otherwise we are free to own and to trade crypto as we like even if there are no exchanges.

Things just got interesting After being unsuccessful in trying to bring down bitcoin, they'll be coming up with more ways to bring it down. As if the bad media press releases are enough. Permissined blockchains is the first step in the chsin of attacks to bring centralization into the space. Right now, I don't invest at all if the project isn't fully blockchain based (permissionless blockchains to be specific). Thanks for the heads-up!