at the end of this a lot of bounties that has to do KYC inspection at the end, but it's in my opinion difficult to do its many bounties without KYC verification.

There is a good effect also having a kyc in fairness because they want to determine if you have a multiple accounts, a lot of members here has a multiple accounts so to be fair with other members they implement this kyc.

What's fair in that?
Many people dislike KYC and they'd never get involved if they knew that they'd be required to go through it.

It would be very good if such bounty managers and projects could be blacklisted somehow.
I think it's a scheme for them to pay less bounty tokens then it was planned.

It happens to me recently .. The bounty manager didn't mention it earlier
I mean they're explained it at the end of campaign. That makes many hunters mad
They are cheating !! if they mention it earlier i think many hunter will not join their campaign because this KYC rules

It is okey for me to have KYC for bounty campaigns to lessen fraud and multiple accounts registration but this is not good if it is announce almost a week before the ICO closes because its like the ICO does not want to pay its hunter. This kyc rule should be posted at the start of the campaign.

KYC system is good but there have many problem when we do this.For that,many participators don't get reward for their work.But it is needed for verification,I think.But sometimes it is just do unfair things where there has no solution for passing KYC.

This is terrible. Especially when the information appears at the end. WeLocal will not use KYC.

I really think the anonymity or the privacy of every person will be deprived this is decentralization we are talking about and the right to be unknown to each and everyone hear can be of nothing, they will need your personal information then your security will be known too, I am against this kind of System and if it is needed for the bounty to get paid I'd rather not participate with them.

If you are a real person and you have clean records, you should not fear KYC policy. But to be fair enough to those people who are not willing to disclose their private information, despite of not displaying it publicly, the ICO campaign must announce it before anything else. This way, time and effort will be saved. No more checking too many profiles if not all of those are willing to comply with the KYC policy right?

obviously such actions are never fair.
bounty hunter or not doesn't matter, it is some sort of contract between the worker and the employer and after they have done the work the employer can not change or add new rules for the payment.