I know there are people like you who will think I know what was going to happen from the start. Why will I risk myself for that in the first place? How much will that pay for me?
I have been against them from the very beginning these issues started, my concern is to get participants paid.
I don't even think of payment because the issue on board is much bigger than my payment and you think i will be asking devs about my pay in btc leaving participants?

 
Thanks for your suggestion.

If the BitPlay team believes in transparency, then why all of a sudden that the escrowed funds were transferred into another account while the campaign undergoes? Also, the way they handle participant concerns is very unprofessional which gives in that something fishy is going on. As a manager, it is your responsibility to secure the funds for this campaign. A lot of people here have been victimized and its not easy for the majority of campaign members to accept tokens as a payment for what they've done. What is the assurance that they will buy back those tokens? From what exchange platform it will undergo or how will they do it? Is there's a surety that the tokens value is equal to bitcoin payment that was been posted at the beginning of your thread? If you or the dev team do not give specific answers regarding this, then we participants have the right to reject and demand payments still in bitcoin. After all, you've broken our trust and if you are a victim as well, open a reputation report against BitPlay in order for the participants to stop suspicions against you.


Nevermind, I've got the answer for my two questions above.

If you have the funds to buy back those tokens with Bitcoin, then why not directly pay in BTC? You guys making it more complicated.

There's no guarantee that those tokens that you will pay to us is equal to the rate given at the beginning of this campaign as the price per token will be determined after the conclusion of your pre-sale.

So this campaign is restarted ?

Wow Great. So that's how EVERY campaign should work from now onward. They should be advertising in Services section with payment in BTC and then pay in altcoins in the end.

Those who can't fulfill this little BTC promise, how can you think their token will be any worth? They will also scam the ICO.

Final another suggestion  , can we continue to run this campaign for 2 months or even more with payment in Scam tokens ?

LOL, I knew it would turn this way only. And the funniest thing is that participants are accusing manager for not doing Escrow. Didn't you see yourself that the Escrow has been done by the company itself, which was the first sign of scam. And there were many other Escorw service providers, but he just keeps ranting one name Lauda. Also the reason that this campaign was not successful is that the ICO is plain scam. When an ICO takes investments via Paypal, you should know it is a scam. The only reason that dev is posting here so that he can receive more investments and then pump and dump.

Seriously guys, your greed is what really scammed you, not manager and not the dev. Be careful next time.

As for the scam accusation, I had already opened it here, if only you guys were more vigilant. https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3330302.msg34809423#msg34809423

You know I had left the campaign to participate in this campaign.But bull shit.You had scam us.We want our payment for one week work.We had worked for you to promote this .If you had a idea to pay in tokens,you have to keep in bounty.Why you made in this section.If you don't pay in bitcoin,red tag is coming to your account soon.

Lol, the fact that the campaign manager thinks that forcing people to accept their tokens instead of the BTC as promised is laughable.

Also, the fact that BitPlay thinks they can simply decide not to pay the BTC they promised the participants, and instead offer their worthless Monopoly money is pathetic. This will be a stain on the company's reputation, and I'm hoping people here don't make it easy to cover up.

The truth is this, sieemma offered BTC for participants in the signature campaign to complete certain tasks, many of these people completed the tasks. Now, around 100 people have been adversely affected by this u-turn. You might have gotten a bad conversion rate, that sucks for you. But you got what you requested, a signature campaign.

Sieemma you need to open a scam accusation, it doesn't matter if they pay in their useless token, you can't just offer gold, and then pay in dirt.

Everyone else who has been adversely affected, please inform the DT members, and let's see what they think about this practice. It is my opinion that the official bitplay account should take some negs;

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1797092

Also, OP might also deserve some negs if he continues to avoid posting the scam accusation, as he is complicit in this scam.

Thanks, I will update you
edit: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3369883.msg35309948#msg35309948