<<  >> (p.22)
    Author Topic: Bitcoin at the US Senate  (Read 67207 times)
    NewLiberty
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1204
    Merit: 1002


    Gresham's Lawyer


    View Profile WWW
    November 20, 2013, 08:48:40 PM
     #421

    Careful or you might confuse folks.  Hashing uses crypto, but the block-chain doesn't hide the result, rather it uses the cryptographic result as an indexable tx reference, so it is incorrect to say "there is no encryption in the Bitcoin protocol".
    Encryption in the form of hashes, is frequently used in digital forensics to irrefutably verify a dataset as unchanged.  So the blockchain comes pre-subpoened, and pre-forensically useful.  It doesn't get any better than that for the LEOs.

    A hash is not "encrypted" data.  Something that is "encrypted" can be "decrypted" with a key.  When something is hashed it cannot be decrypted and there is no key.

    http://www.danielmiessler.com/study/encoding_encryption_hashing/

    Thanks for that.  We agree on the definitions, and your point is well made here, and appreciated.  (I am getting frequently interrupted as I am typing and doing so sloppily.)  My intended point was not just that there encryption in Bitcoin, as well as hashing, but that the senator was left with the impression that the general ledger was encrypted (with a trapdoor prime number), and the good bits about it being already what the LEOs want was lost.

    FREE MONEY1 Bitcoin for Silver and Gold NewLibertyDollar.com and now BITCOIN SPECIE (silver 1 ozt) shows value by QR
    Bulk premiums as low as .0012 BTC "BETTER, MORE COLLECTIBLE, AND CHEAPER THAN SILVER EAGLES" 1Free of Government
Page 21
Viewing Page: 22