All my effort I have put in on NXT is stolen by others, just like optical is telling, who received huge bounty's.
I warned you all for dgex that it was a huge security flaw.
Recieved in all that time some NXT from exactly 2 stakeholders.
One moment I proposed even to buy a little amount of NXT from someone, NOBODY wanted to sell.
I was devoted to NXT, but from now one you can go on with them thiefs.
sorry guys I dont follow you all this road.
edit: look out, or some day you will choke on all your NXT hoarders.
GL to all
Pin
link:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/345773.msg4100746#msg4100746Just so you know, one of your biggest fans is bi-polar.
That 'pinarello' guy loves you, then hates you minutes apart. Word to the wise, I would not trust him.
Ok enough is enough. I had never said anything wrong about emunie, but since you wanna start a smear campaign to me in person... Visin, go take a piece of the big emunie pie before it is started, mister "decentralized in your sig" emunie is a compagny, that has nothing to do with crypto or what its stands for, you guys mean big business, nothing wrong wuth that but you should warn the people and change your sig., Here a little coversation about the "foundation" already rolling over the florr over who will get what !
Posted 07 September 2013 - 07:34 AM
I started a discussion yesterday (when Dan was also present and contributing too). We didn't miss-interpret anything but revising the ideas about the foundation structure and I humbly offered this:
After things get done, codes finalized, final group of members determined and set by Dan, and we were approaching the public launch, from that point on, all the founders will have an equal share+vote power in the future foundation agendas. There will be a foundation capital +some plans of development. Every plan or project that would be introduced or offered, will be decided by the founders voting and then a fund from the capital will be assigned for its implementation. From this point on, every person, a founder or some developer guy from outside being hired, also the inventor and/or designer of the project, will be paid from that fund being assigned for the project proportionally, of course people who invest more time and talent in future should be paid more, and that is the way we have by paying these people something like salary for their amount of contribution, even outside investors can come in (by foundation collective permission) and invest and instead, they can be paid up a percentage of the project profit or even some founders' share (again by foundation decision), but the main line of profit will go back to the foundation capital from which every founder has an equal share..
And as we discussed yesterday, Dan will have a kind of veto power, so if at any point things go to wrong sides, he can stop and re-correct them (his analogy was like the US president dealing with congress collective decisions).
Ecoinomist
eMu Analyst
and plenty more where that came from !