It is sad to say that unfortunately its useless now , microwallet is going away anyways so there won't be a script to keep using for landofbitcoin

We have to wait and see.

>Trustworthy users buy script.
>They start services.
>Microwallet shuts down, listing said services on their website.
>Faucet admins change their scripts by deleting and re-downloading 'microwallet.php' and perhaps changing minimal amounts of script.
>Everything is back to normal, with 2-3 Microwallets instead of one.

 The one thing that actually concerns me that , when you need to make a minimal amount of 5k give or take satoshi to withdraw , with 2-3 that will be 5k for each of them. So that will take longer comparing to one microwallet instead of 3. Of course there is a trust factor , we all trust LoB (even tough I am his direct competition (jk I am not even close to him) ) and we need to trust new ones as well , tough that doesn't sound that terrifying if I know him I know he will select 3 trustworthy good people to operate it.

Let us look at this logically... If microwallet.org is/was offering it as a free service, what would motivate 3 others (who would replace microwallet) to also run it as a free service? There would have to be some skimming/commission for most people to be interested.

So, for example, I could easily run it, I have physical servers to run VMs for redundancy, balancing etc, all in a high tier data centre but if I had to spend time and resources I would need ROI, otherwise it would die (eventually) with no income, which appears to be somewhat the case here.

I would suggest that if it is becoming a chore to run the service to charge a handling fee, I am certain they would get many transactions passing through so a few satoshi per transaction would be a nice revenue stream. Especially when you consider many saucets give out over 100 satoshi every dispense, it would mean maybe one more dispense before someone would cash out, there is also the advert method, but not too many people would be looking at their balance after every dispense... so limited revenue there....

Thoughts?

Concerning that they want around 2,000 USD as per https://www.microwallet.org/index/sale as that would put off most potential buyers, especially if the expectation is that there will be no revenue and time in maintaining it.

I would be happy to run it on one of my TLDs or a sub domain of a TLD I have, and would be good to have them around for a bit to bed it in. Once operational my plan would be to monetize it with a small commission to help with costs and feed some to the dev for their work and effort, which would foresee ably be more than the 4btc asking price over time but then I would also expect minimal maintenence, such as more along the lines of monitoring and backing up, etc.

Well there is my unofficial bid....

One big selling point from my side would be that I do not need to prove ROI in a short time as it would be set up on a VM with no real cost to me, as I already have the rack space and data being paid for for the other VMs running on the servers, so it would piggyback off the existing hardware and connections (ok, so it will cost me an IP address... I don't use all of my allocation, so no issue).

I was thinking the same thing, only 1 service will get all the traffic the other ones will suffer and be pointless

What if there are many microfaucets and one huge MACRO faucet? 

Microwallet.org only credited half of my coins that i sent. Tried emailing with now response. Whats going on?

yes i just created one