According to Berkshire VC Munger, Bitcoin is nearly as bad as Trading Harvested Baby Brains.
I was unaware that trading harvested baby brains could be of some use for mankind, but Berkshire VC Munger probably knows better. Of course, after such a statement the price of Baby Brains could be really hurt.
I wanted to make an impartial, rational and balanced comment on this statement, but then my eyes have slided on the top comment of a reader on CNN's site, which I'm now sharing here, since it may meet some consensus in our community:
" Harvested Baby....." YOU FOOL! YOU VULGAR NEANDERTHAL AND OPPORTUNISTIC infection!
As IF, you could NEVER be wrong!! As if you saw the 2008 Meltdown coming and said so...which you DID NOT!
As If you saw the DOT COM meltdown on the horizon and warned the human race - you didn't!!! You dung and vomit fed, witless, immoral rash on the butt of a slime mold in Hell! Go gargle a hand grenade you simpering stammering sycophant! FOOL!
https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-nearly-as-bad-as-trading-harvested-baby-brains-berkshire-vc-munger/Surprise, surprise.
In what way is bitcoin immoral? Is being an alternative currency to fiat immoral? If that's the case, then is gold immoral? At least do some research before you speak. As OP said, baby brains as a comparison to bitcoin is just absolutely ridiculous. The government accepts bitcoin, there are regulations surrounding it, and it's growing. Baby brain dealing is something of another kind.
And how exactly are people who push bitcoin as a currency and as an idea for decentralization a disgrace?
Yes, bitcoin can be speculative. But that's not all it is. There's a difference between bitcoin's price fluctuation, and bitcoin itself, and it's definitely not immoral.