A
PR activist of another coin made a claim that InstantX is not safe and seems to have a lot of flaws. Anyone happen to know what these flaws are that he is talking about?
instant confirmations aren't safe. instantX seems to have a lot of flaws, so we are not messing with that.
Sorry, there are no flaws and in fact instantX's performance is what Evolution, the next stage of Dash are built upon. So that person has no idea of what he speaketh
I just checked the link and realized you got me, you bugger! LOL
Lol, was going to quote a point one of the others brought up and thought better of it
It's not only 6 folks providing liquidity for mixing dumbasses, its 6 folks funded by the worlds first Decentralized Autonomous Organization to provide liquidity, there's hundreds
mixing ensuring fungibility today and thousands are just months away.
1) the fact that you need liquidity providers to have somewhat usable mixing (still very slow) shows clearly that your system is flawed
2) the "decentralized autonomous organization" is neither decentralized, nor autonomous as it requires a "
fund manager" for the liquidity providers.
3) instantX is a crazy form of "proof of stake" which is just flawed by design. You can't get consensus when miners decide to mine a double spend in stead of the "locked" transaction.
