I wish I could watch it because I could probably catch errors, but I used to work with blustering male fools who were so jealous of those more intelligent and creative as well as those who made more money, and these two sound just like them.  Those men did everything they could to be a cog in the wheel and cause trouble.  They were some of the most prejudiced people I knew, and these two men in the video sound just the same.  I got sick watching the first minute or so, and could watch no more.  Like PTSD, ugh!  Definitely not worth my time and energy.

LOL, great picture!  What people don't seem to understand is that the payout to MNs is because they are running the network, not because they are holders.  The collateral is to secure the network against attack.  Anyway, none of this matters because we're not building Dash for pencil neck geeks, but for everyday consumers.  We are building a USABLE product, and that's what these people don't understand.  They want to "stick it to the man" but we want to build something that might actually improve the world, for real.  Forget "redistribution of wealth" we're for ability and opportunity.  If you have that, you should be able to build your own fortunes!  And Dash is here to help you!

When "obfuscation" is the name of your game it seems to extend to faux technical appraisals of competing coins too.

For example, if you're going to discuss "liquidity" (in the context of masternodes in this case) you should specify whether you're talking about:

 • blockchain liquidity
 • market liquidity

A system that constrained blockchain liquidity would be something like what Bitbay is planning. Where coin movements are mechanically constrained in order to prevent them from going to market as part of an economic pegging strategy against another currency.

On the other hand, market liquidity varies with price and is determined by the aggregate propensity of traders to sell. To do an appraisal of market liquidity you just need to look at a market depth chart because it is a function of price.

Dash does not impose any blockchain liquidity constraints. None at all. When you open a wallet, all coins are equally liquid and the wallet doesn't care whether they happen to be collateraising a masternode or not. All address balances are all equally mobile.

Dash also does not impose any market constraints. Those are imposed voluntarily by holders. The network gives them an incentive to hold because Dash's monetary model is working as a store of value in the sense that the tokens are valuable and now have a finite lending rate which has been a design objective of this project from the outset. i.e. to build a true, unbacked monetary token as opposed to a blockchain based encryption tunnel.

To ignore these fundamental concepts and design objectives in any so called "technical appraisal" is like having a racing yacht designer appraise an ocean going trawler and diss it based on its adverse volume to weight ratio, power loading, hydrodynamic profiles and cargo capacity.

i.e. clueless  
 

I couldn't watch more than 10 minutes, but what I saw is:

-xmr (rank 5) decreasing since one month, Dash (rank 6) increasing since one month. So fluffy once again in full conflict of interest.


-2 kids crying about instamine




-We have proof that Fluffy didn't even make his home work, and know nothing about Dash:


So my reaction (Like a lot of Youtube comments) was:

I'll need to start one of those "bitcoin obituary" things for Dash, except a #REKT one  

(Could maybe superimpose it on top of a steadily growing 21-week EMA for effect).

No shortage of contributions to choose from anyway (although all from only about 3 1 people sadly)  

Who is Tone Veys? Who is fluffyponzipony? Who cares about their opinions?

They didn't even bother to look at facts and to understand how, for example, Instantsend works. Fluff lies intentionally with contempt like fraudster (or he is indeed an idiot) that there are two or three locks on tx, minute later says that there is one tx lock, to show people how "easy" Instantsend is to attack. What a lying FraudsterPony.

If they say they love Dash...whatever.

If they say they hate Dash...whatever. Who cares about such "educated" and "professional" opinion?

I watched it for 3m only, and ouch, how pathetic and childish those idiots look when they pose as an experts.
Well they surely should work for Hilary Clinton at CNN or wright for Washington Post.

I gave them to much attention and credit for even watching them for three minutes.

I just had to steal this basket of info for youtube. Thanks tok

I see you're hard at work today. Thought you might get a break after that little staged hit piece

No rest for the wicked it seems 

Such future...

https://blockchain.info/charts/bip-9-segwit

Wow Tone high profile Bitcoin peddling is not working that great 

Hello everybody! At some point between November 1 and November 26, my account was hacked and somebody posted several times as me, and sent a couple of PMs. It doesn't look like any real damage was done, and the mod cyrus was great and helped me recover my account. If you have received any messages from me or read any posts AFTER November 1 up until today, they *were not me.* I posted a few days ago on ddink8; I can now retire that account.

I was guilty of reusing the same password for many sites; this shouldn't be a problem any longer (thanks Lastpass). To prove my identity, please see the message that I posted in early 2014, confirming ownership of the BTC address listed below: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/581411.msg6360008#msg6360008. I have used the address to sign the following message.

[BEGIN SIGNED MESSAGE]
This is the original owner of the account ddink7. I was hacked and have recovered my account.
[BTC ADDRESS]
1PNa9dZ3P3fVhx1uMCqJ4sEYmyhxnQNy3M
[SIGNATURE]
G9Fz/Uy4M4Sl6SKbK9EGYARhygi12E45Uj+Voas984eAXQeZgC818zgZ4uPAfUjWRCS27rmg8MpEtlGy0j6eAyE=
[END SIGNED MESSAGE]