A lot of people who keep a small amount of DASH coins, less than 1000.
Give all coin holders a percentage like the master node and they will sell less. This is a stable income, it is better than losing on the stock exchange.
Let's say the coins did not move in the wallet for one month, 0.5% increased. I think many people will like this bonus
True, it would be an interesting way to attract retail investors.
Imagine, for example, the Crownode platform that currently offers that service from a single Dash for a commission on rewards.
Now let's think that Dash does the same and the funds obtained by that "custody" go to the funds of the network itself to distribute them in other projects.
Wouldn't it be worth it?
For example Dash Core lives on budgets, but they could also obtain passive income by developing an application similar to Crownode ... or directly outsource Crownode or another company that offers that service.
In the desktop or mobile wallet itself, you could choose the staking option if you wish to leave those funds "frozen", and with the guarantee that the third party that manages it belongs to the Dash network itself.
Why give commissions to Kraken crownode or Coinbase ... when we can do it ... then whoever wants to use external services to do so, but make it a private choice.
You two are basically describing Ryan Taylor's 'Deterministic Holders List' (also known as Savings Accounts) option, which would be based on our already working Deterministic Masternodes List :
https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/consensus-mechanisms.49135/
It would be trustless and could possibly present an alternative to centralized staking on a third party site (like staking on an exchange).
Downside is that it would require a minimum amount of Dash (100 Dash is mentioned), to keep the list manageable. Which means not everyone could participate.
And it would require a change in our block reward allocation.
Good contribution qwizzie, I think we should tender something similar to that.
If, for example, the Dash Investment Foundation acquires an important market value and weight, the masternode share option would not be misleading.
I think that the current 1000 Dash staking ecosystem is not bad, but delegating to third parties and being able to deliver that profit to Dash Network is a shame.
the discussion is served, and obviously it will be a bit complicated to move forward knowing that the master nodes are happy with their 7%, they will not vote anything that could jeopardize this, but they must think that in the long term it is better to get less, if the ecosystem gets bigger and better.
