OP has a point, but damn those comments are beyond horrible and almost everyone of them has dangerous superficial knowledge. They're probably butthurt Litecoin2.0 aka Vertcoin didn't take off.
Yeah, I know, but that is/was not the point of my post.
I am an investor and I prefer not to fall too much in love with my investments, so I do not take it as the best indicator that there are no substantial answers to my questions.
I really like DRK, but fanboi behavior makes me worry. To me, not only those spreading "FUD" are trolls. The immature "to da moon" and "drk über alles" guys are as well (not talking about you in particular, even if your comment about "butthurt" vtc investors does not add any substantial info and I`am saying this as someone who dumped almost all his VTC to jump on the DRK bandwagon a few weeks ago).
Edit: I`m actually bottom fishing and rebalancing a bit towards VTC again. This Stealth Adress concept sounds interesting and so far no DRK expert could answer whether DRK is going to be able to replicate that.
Contemplate this: Dark is simultaneously being "attacked" by Bytecoin clones for not being anonymous enough and then Vertcoin comes along and says "oh you are too anonymous for our preference".
Darkcoin is the main river right now, carrying on with the anonymity. Everyone is trying to be the tributary river who gains money off Drk by inventing "problems" that they can "improve upon".
Vertcoin discovered that the "problem" of Darkcoin is too much anonymity and it has the solution to "fix it": Privacy.
Bytecoin clones discovered that the "problem" of Darkcoin is that it's level of anonymity is not like NSA-proof grade, and thus "not anonymous" (yet BCN + clones aren't NSA proof either and if they say they are = it's snake oil). But that's secondary to the huge other problems they have in terms of being an untested blockchain platform (or those of usability and scaling).