I am taking it as a positive sign that hero member 'tokeweed' has entered the thread...  

tokeweed, it's hard to ask this in a bitcoin thread without getting shat upon by frothing zealots, but do you think the bitcoin crowd who have been using BTC on the deep web up to now are finally getting the message that BTC (plus trusted mixers that magically get 'hacked' etc.) isn't the best tool for the job?

If any of the tor sites that got busted yesterday have been keeping records, there's a fair chance that users as well as dealers might be getting a knock at the door from nasty men in uniforms.

Tried to imagine how a wallet that is as simple as possible would look like:



Please note, that I am not a professional UI designer, nor do I belong to the dev team. So it's just a random DRK fan's quick scrabble just for fun.

Private funds section has both Spendable and In Progress, because imo the anonymization process should be able to have part of the denominations fully anonymized and ready to be used (gone through required rounds already) while part of the funds not. This could happen when some of the denominations have found mixing partners very fast, while other denominations have not. Or, the user has decided to anonymize some more coins while the previous ones are still denominating. Or, the user has sent private coins and the "Amount of Darkcoin to keep anonymized" threshold has been hit.

It should contain as little information as possible. For example, unless there are unconfirmed coins, Incoming balance shouldn't be displayed at all, i.e. no need to display "Incoming: 0.00 DRK".

Likewise, if the anonymization process is not running, In Progress shouldn't be visible.


[ ] Cool
[ ] Sux
[ ] Maybe
[ ] Camo's remaining nut

events dear boy, events.

Events hit at unexpected times. nothing to do with trading.

i am the wrong person to ask.  i was never a super hardcore bitcoiner, but i am a fan of the tech and the movement, as i am a fan of some of the altcoin projects as well.

but to answer, i think deep down they are getting the message. take darkcoin and openbazaar for instance, i think it would be much safer for your privacy to accept darkcoin if you were selling anal intruder devices.

it's a perfect match, that's why i suggested the DRK whales and users to send donations to openbazaar as the devs there need a little help:  http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2ll7po/openbazaar_needs_donations/

if there was a project that could take darkcoin to a whole new level, it's openbazaar.  so why not start a good relationship with them?

Where did you get that quote? These are the current specs:

84M was the amount of coins before we decided to do a finite supply. We looked at various reward curves and let the community vote on the parameters. It ended up being a 7% decline each year, totaling in about 21M coins. Actually the first decline is coming up here in January.

A little decline is always welcome 

Does Bitcoin even have bloom filters or was it just something they want to implement? Was it hard to put in?

Thanks eddufield for personal comment , actually honored.
 
 

haha it is the image which makes a smile on your face