Is this miner still the fastest one? https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/623409.0

Also, could anyone give me an example of a .bat for two 270x's? I haven't mined in a long time and I think I was using terrible settings. What kind of hashrate can I expect per card?

Oh, I wasn't clear, I see. I didn't say the problem is on your end. It's not your fault. I guess it's either the installer or the executable itself which doesn't properly take some facts into account. I proposed a possible workaround idea for the problem. If you continue on testing then you might find the real underlaying problem and/or eliminate other possibilities which can help the developer to fix it...

I will try to use the installer myself.

Hey darkbros so now with this hard fork fiasco how hard do you think DRK price is going to drop? I already got burned buying at the top .0082 (I know I'm an idiot) so I am sincerely asking you people who have made enough money that you don't have any motives for others to buy, or are a genuinely good person. I'm thinking 0.004 in a few weeks time right after the issues get fixed?

Thanks y'all.

This new "rise above" persona really cracks me up.

Darkcoin

1. Exists
2. Works
3. Isn't a fucking browser plugin talking to a centralised server that you have to trust with your money and your liberty



I think that covers the basics.

i don't have a Crystal ball but I think it will depend on these factors:

a) how fast Evan and the dev team comes up with a security patch
b) If 'a' will require hard fork or not
c) In case 'b' is yes then if it will be successful hard fork or not
d) If these will not be additional security vulnerabilities


but i can't give you any specific number out of my ass

I'm quite confused. This is what I've always seen when I go to the download page:



All this time I've just been downloading the "Windows (zip)" file and then wherever I unzip it to, double clicking darkcoin-qt.exe in the \32 directory to run the Darkcoin wallet. I've never had any wallet issues but neither have I known I was running the "binary version", I just assumed there wasn't an installer (which I thought was something that would come eventually when the whole project is out of beta). I downloaded "Windows (zip)" because the other option is "Windows (32-bit)" and I'm running 64-bit so assumed "Windows (32-bit)" would be the wrong version for me.

This is very confusing. As well as getting the installer version issues fixed (as per PatMan's posts), we need far greater clarification around this labelling. There should be a "windows installer" version or a "run directly" version. Non-technical people won't know what all this means. It's probably one of the reasons why someone like Bagholder010 (who had the 14K DRK on Mintpal and got another 14K DRK during the V2 shenanigans) doesn't know how to use a wallet on his PC; it's too complicated having odd terminology like this. The wallet should be easily downloadable by noobs and non-technical people with an easy upgrade process that actively assists people to ensure they don't write over their wallet.dat. The labelling on what's being downloaded needs to be much clearer and consistent. The techo/boffin aspects around the wallet are still way too dominant for widespread adoption.

I hear you Luigi.

He reminds me of the psychopaths that are in charge at the moment.
Or the main stream media.

Just keep repeating the same shit over and over and OVER............
Black is white and white is black. War is peace and peace is war.
I'm now a person with morals....... I'll just keep acting like a normal person with a soul, and I'll just keep doing it over and over and over till it's swallowed.

Hmmmm....try to look at it from a noob point of view, after all, we were all noobs once, even you. The installer is the top, uppermost link that says windows - so instinctively that will be the one that a noob will click on. They'll install it, it won't work. They'll uninstall it & leave thinking "WTF was that?".

To be adopted (which is what everyone wants), it has to be clear & it needs to work. Simple.