'Instamine' as it is called, is often a positive. The originators and developers should have a large pool of available funds, otherwise they are undercapitalised. They can continually sell into the market, improving distribution.

Numbers of users and community size is everything, and DRK is amongst the top 10 cryptos for that (probably number 5).

Can you enlighten me as to the fraudlent dealings ? (comparative to other crypto)

The tech is as good as any. Trolls are attracted to any big thread.

Welcome to my ignore list.

Comparative to other crypto I have no idea, nor do I particularly care. It bears some vague resemblance to the Bytecoin scam I happen to be familiar with, in that a fake cover story was created in order to "sell" the instamine/premine. Now obviously the details are different. (I don't think anyone here is claiming darkcoin was created by aliens.) In general though, it is totally impractical for me to actively police coin scams. I don't go around examining every coin or other crypto-related scam to see what sort of questionable or outright deceptive practices I can find.

What I come across, I come across.

As for this particular coin, I've addressed it previously on this thread and I will be subscribed here now, so I'll reply on topic as various issues are discussed.

More discussion is on another thread: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/999886.0

Research continues.


Not in my opinion nor the option of any credible experts I've discussed it with or heard comment on it. Kristof Atlas's review was mixed at best as I interpret it. No doubt it was/is spun more positively here.

But it doesn't surprise me that no one here is interested in those sorts of things, as you say, comparative to other crypto, not much different. Everybody wants their coin pumped and doesn't want to hear negatives.

When for a long time your life revolves around one thing only, and you are consumed by it 24/7, every little issue can grow to massive proportions. Meditate on that, and you'll gain some perspective on how the general public will really feel about an "instamine".

Not sure why you where trying to reason with him anyway. He keeps calling this coin a scam yet I still can't figure out who has been scammed. Where are the undelivered upon promises, the tech that doesn't work like it should, the promised returns that never pan out... I see none of that here. Oh, right... in the future the dev team is supposed to dump on our heads when they held all the way up to $15 and continued development as we fell back down to $1.

And for DRK/DASH supposedly having crap anonymity nobody has traced a transaction even though any big Monero investor has an obvious motive to break our system.

Give me the dev team that continues to push out new tech over the one that stoops to the level of crapping in other coins threads.

Glad you doing well,thanks for your market update I didn't realize bter still aren't paying out, I lost trust and stopped using them after the hack, was wondering if people got their btc back also ?

P.S. Nancy has great screen presence-what class, a different era altogether (compared to Lady Gaga or Christine Aguilara, I mean really?!). 'My boots are made for walking' does it for me  
https://youtu.be/PCoCVYrJWYU

Is that what you call them ?

I'd call it the petulant wailing of a highly conflicted troll who thinks that burying a perfectly good technology in cryptographic 'tar' somehow equates to making it more funginble and who can't see for red mist when he looses the argument with the market.

Great. That's the way it should be. Distribution was also improved !

DRK is not that important, and I am not a sizeable investor, but the arguments here seem poorly founded.

I believe it may go, and I also believe it may not. Adjust percentages to your liking. And I didn't talk specifically about DRK/DASH, but about any "instamine" generally. But you're fast to jump to conclusions and straw men.

An "instamine" is an issue only for those who missed the launch and had all the time in the world to buy cheap coins but didn't and are now jelly, and those whose actions are guided by "higher morals" seeing scams everywhere (refer to my previous post).