No, that's actually a bad analogy he just used and I was disregarding Bitcoin's denominations(vs fish for all things). Originally it was, 31 billion zeitcoins(Who can also be divided into 8 decimal places) and 1 BTC.

He's purposely trying to change things to suit his flawed argument, same as when he said that cryptocurrencies don't use much cryptography.

Thank you, hopefully you can also tell him that cryptography is prominently used in cryptocurrencies.

I swear to god if anyone of you guys and girls sends a single dash to "dashpays" I will never accept any opinion you have about any subject more than I would the opinion of a toddler. Since you'll have clearly shown to not have any critical thinking.

I have had you on ignore for some reason, to be honest I am not sure why.. Especially when I look back at your posts. However since I refuse to make AW No.1 in anything you can remain leader until a new troll leader rises :p

Edit: Since there is no official troll list I used those I know are trolls or had on ignore(which may have been those responding to them), will update when we have one or maybe will do one with number Moreno mentions.

No, I haven't even thought of that until I read your comment, how is my talk no substance when I've corrected everything your fellow has incorrectly, sometimes deceivingly said? Are you trying to troll? I was responding to the ludicrous statements made by toknormal and co.

You can go through my posting history to show you exactly what he said(It was entirely wrong, even gmaxwell corrected him). He said crytography, so we can only assume it was in general and encompassed all that you've listed.

Not doubting his analysis skills, he just continues to argue many false points while subtly changing the wording to fit his favor.

You being cryptic? ;p

To clarify, I was highlighting the distinction between:

[1] encryption

and

[2] digital signatures

I cited a presentation where Vitalic Buterin stated categorically that there was no "encryption" in cryptocurrencies - rather they work use hashes and digital signatures (in Dash, blind signatures).

I wrongly paraphrased his statement as saying "there is no cryptography in cryptocurrencies" instead of "there is no encryption in cryptocurrencies".  A few posts later, I corrected myself and acknowledged the misquote, at which point I got (predictably) lambasted for being clueless about cryptography (Digital signatures and encryption are different branches of the more general term 'cryptography').

Here's the clip so judge for yourself the gravity of my misquote. In fact when Vitalik asks "anyone see what's wrong with that title", an audience member answers "cryptography" and Vitalik replies "Yes", however the more specific branch thats relevant is encryption.

Here's the clip (You need the sound up):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=zgkmQ-jQJHk#t=302

Relevant on both fronts...here and at the winery.  Lol.  Awesome find and thanks for sharing that!