Bitcointalk Mobile Browser presented by IRLBTC™

<< >> (p.472)

Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency (Read 9724653 times)

tseug

Member

Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 09:55:53 PM

#9421

Is there a proper solution to get the wallet to sync past block 34139?

I started with no user data and a freshly compiled wallet from newest github revision, the nodes from 10-20 pages back and still no full sync. Tried without those nodes, again no user data, and same issue.

Any help?

COMM: CWjCf3Pb6vAgpRxbP2CKQQFLBXYuS7axpG
SHA: STpwADnhpYk7ZAMRmJvFDJaXSSby3LpGiu

sippsnapp

Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:07:47 PM

#9422

Quote from: tseug on March 18, 2014, 09:55:53 PM

I just compiled a new node list, not complete yet. Its p2p pool nodes and random connected nodes to my other nodes, all those nodes are pretty much 24/7 currently.
try at your own risk

http://pastebin.com/ERfv92JF

i just loaded a fresh compiled qt wallet wit hthese nodes in 3 minutes

Code:

23:08:26

getinfo

23:08:26

{
"version" : 90000,
"protocolversion" : 70002,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : lolthastmylilsecret,
"blocks" : 35920,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 31,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 217.37163291,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1393894916,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"unlocked_until" : 0,
"errors" : ""
}

Πάντα ῥεῖ
Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm

eduffield (OP)

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036

Dash Developer

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:08:46 PM

#9423

Some users have been asking me questions about what happened with the pool and KGW exploit. They were confused that the two were somehow connected and I thought I would clear it up.

Pool Exploit

The pool exploit was due to a miss-configuration of the stratum mining software that allowed miners to submit lower than normal difficulty shares. These shares were technically worthless and should have been invalid, but the software couldn't tell. If you're pool is still affected by this, here is how to fix it.

Use the branch "Feature(MultiAlgo)" from this repo: https://github.com/Crypto-Expert/stratum-mining

After cloning that and checking out the correct branch, modify algo/coindefinition.py to use xcoin_hash.

Here's an example configuration for Darkcoin: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7116297/

KimotoGravityWell vs DarkGravityWave

We recently experienced a spike of difficulty from 300 to 10048 for one block. This was done by using a timewarp exploit on KimotoGravityWell where the user would submit an invalid timestamp on a block. To fix this issue without causing any unintended issues I implemented my own difficulty algorithm called DarkGravityWave, which uses 2 Exponential Moving Averages and 1 Simple Moving Average. These respond very quickly to shifts in the hashrate, but when invalid timestamps appear they can't impact the difficulty like we experienced before.

Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io

eduffield (OP)

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036

Dash Developer

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:10:24 PM

#9424

Quote from: taoway on March 18, 2014, 09:45:44 PM

Something stinks on Coindesk! I have been trying to submit the DEVs whitepaper on coindesk in the comments section, but for some reason they wont allow it??? Preferouss has 10 negative comments and I cant even submit one comment that shows what a turd he is??? Am I missing something?

I submitted a reply to that guy with all of the crazy comments, including the whitepaper and they deleted it too. I'm going to try just replying, maybe it's the link

Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io

sippsnapp

Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:11:00 PM

#9425

Quote from: eduffield on March 18, 2014, 10:08:46 PM

today i checked on that stratum darkcoin but how to execute that? i will need it in a few days for solomining rigs.

Πάντα ῥεῖ
Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm

chaeplin

Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:11:12 PM

#9426

Quote from: tifozi on March 18, 2014, 09:32:44 PM

Ahhhh, I am so missing this as I needed to pick some up Sad

@chaeplin

Moved my rig out. Thanks for the heads up.

^^ first page http://darckcoin.mine.nu/ (p2p) should changed to
http://darkcoin.mine.nu/ (p2pool node finder)

Yes typo (by me)

coins101

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:38:12 PM

#9427

Quote from: eduffield on March 18, 2014, 10:10:24 PM

Quote from: taoway on March 18, 2014, 09:45:44 PM

I submitted a reply to that guy with all of the crazy comments, including the whitepaper and they deleted it too. I'm going to try just replying, maybe it's the link

The journalist of the article has since been on twitter promoting darkcoin....looks like he tweeted your interview with Simone Brunozzi. Tweet him back the paper and ask for an interview write up on coindesk

https://twitter.com/jonmatonis

chaeplin

Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:42:24 PM

#9428

p2pool block found is anounced to irc.freenode.net #p2pool-drk

child_harold

Hero Member

Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:55:20 PM

#9429

Quote from: eduffield on March 18, 2014, 05:31:46 PM

Apparently we needed a white paper to be a legit crypto-currency, so here it is:

http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkcoinWhitepaper.pdf

Let me know if you see anything that could be improved, clearer, typos, etc.

Dark paper
(March 18, 2014)

http://www.iotatoken.com/

eduffield (OP)

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036

Dash Developer

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:55:35 PM

#9430

Quote from: coins101 on March 18, 2014, 10:38:12 PM

Quote from: eduffield on March 18, 2014, 10:10:24 PM

Quote from: taoway on March 18, 2014, 09:45:44 PM

I submitted a reply to that guy with all of the crazy comments, including the whitepaper and they deleted it too. I'm going to try just replying, maybe it's the link

https://twitter.com/jonmatonis

I would tweet him, but I've tried to post on coindesk to respond to preferrous and everything I write gets deleted. Why would they censor everything I say?

Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io

tseug

Member

Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 10:59:21 PM

#9431

Quote from: sippsnapp on March 18, 2014, 10:07:47 PM

Quote from: tseug on March 18, 2014, 09:55:53 PM

Code:

Thanks but those nodes give me the same result for some reason (even after deleting the blockchain).

Could this be a build specific issue (this is a 32 bit linux build) maybe

COMM: CWjCf3Pb6vAgpRxbP2CKQQFLBXYuS7axpG
SHA: STpwADnhpYk7ZAMRmJvFDJaXSSby3LpGiu

sippsnapp

Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 11:01:59 PM

#9432

Quote from: tseug on March 18, 2014, 10:59:21 PM

Quote from: sippsnapp on March 18, 2014, 10:07:47 PM

Quote from: tseug on March 18, 2014, 09:55:53 PM

Code:

Thanks but those nodes give me the same result for some reason (even after deleting the blockchain).

Could this be a build specific issue (this is a 32 bit linux build) maybe

im solely on x64 ubuntu , worked on 12.04 , 13.10 & 14.04

Πάντα ῥεῖ
Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm

coins101

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 11:04:02 PM

#9433

Quote from: eduffield on March 18, 2014, 10:55:35 PM

Quote from: coins101 on March 18, 2014, 10:38:12 PM

Quote from: eduffield on March 18, 2014, 10:10:24 PM

Quote from: taoway on March 18, 2014, 09:45:44 PM

I submitted a reply to that guy with all of the crazy comments, including the whitepaper and they deleted it too. I'm going to try just replying, maybe it's the link

https://twitter.com/jonmatonis

I would tweet him, but I've tried to post on coindesk to respond to preferrous and everything I write gets deleted. Why would they censor everything I say?

They have a moderation process for first time posts and adding links. If you email them they will manually check and respond: Keith Horwood: keith at coindesk dot com

sippsnapp

Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 11:04:45 PM

#9434

while checking my darkcoin-qt debug log i found these :

Code:

2014-03-18 23:02:44 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:44 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-03-18 23:02:58 AcceptToMemoryPool: 68.57.168.201:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted 617038cb19e4f4fba215fd0d2f80f6962da93d8d4539228c4593d636c6aff48e (poolsz 1)
2014-03-18 23:03:00 AcceptToMemoryPool: 107.170.107.208:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted dadcc1683fdf3aca71e720b015ea8a4fae364bbac70081e2afea3832a343d0d8 (poolsz 2)
2014-03-18 23:03:03 AcceptToMemoryPool: 66.172.33.187:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted c34f46a2c39ab4947b2980c2676b5c04e5469e5c53d8d0da43b1c36aa2a339b7 (poolsz 3)
2014-03-18 23:03:05 AcceptToMemoryPool: 50.19.116.123:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted 696de7f8d0fbf05eba04f399cd9cf1a17769deaca375e54132ffa4a4e6a44e0e (poolsz 4)
2014-03-18 23:03:08 AcceptToMemoryPool: 68.57.168.201:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted 5af6b0dcce9dd9c1678fd23ec70d110b229594f10087d9d19830828966c8794d (poolsz 5)
2014-03-18 23:03:09 received getdata for: tx 5af6b0dcce9dd9c1678fd23ec70d110b229594f10087d9d19830828966c8794d
2014-03-18 23:03:09 AcceptToMemoryPool: 69.140.29.36:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted 11e31eb58f6aa47d0c9f14b6ed30dd1e27488407e827564d9a32a5a6191e1e1b (poolsz 6)
2014-03-18 23:03:11 AcceptToMemoryPool: 77.8.239.177:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted 0ebb116170fe7c49759cdb3ad74ab2a0069690bbe151976baa3ab322b005ec3e (poolsz 7)
2014-03-18 23:03:13 AcceptToMemoryPool: 69.140.29.36:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted 0eb3ffa4bd7be6db42025c6d6dac59a8fc15413e21611398f79844422de25e2b (poolsz 8)
2014-03-18 23:03:31 AcceptToMemoryPool: 213.229.88.102:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted 9053c1c1b752a46723970c85ce57a960cb6b9a50756eddddc3d2d9ec4b7b243c (poolsz 9)
2014-03-18 23:03:31 AcceptToMemoryPool: 81.151.165.89:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted 355d07cd03887cd9813da8c0d973597e7dd486207b729e352705da36c2c8341d (poolsz 10)
2014-03-18 23:03:45 33
2014-03-18 23:03:45 CreateNewBlock(): total size 3408
2014-03-18 23:04:03 trying connection 23.21.204.34 lastseen=0,0hrs
2014-03-18 23:04:03 connected 23.21.204.34
2014-03-18 23:04:03 send version message: version 70002, blocks=35945, us=91.236.116.103:12908, them=23.21.204.34:9999, peer=23.21.204.34:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:04 socket closed
2014-03-18 23:04:04 disconnecting node 23.21.204.34
2014-03-18 23:04:04 AcceptToMemoryPool: 50.19.116.123:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted c8399d5501a7f500fdb6cdca5e79dfd3e215a99db8ac6c8c9fdb46bf1f780218 (poolsz 11)
2014-03-18 23:04:04 AcceptToMemoryPool: 85.131.127.26:9999Satoshi:0.9.0/ : accepted 446326736662285a2f67c991981927cc1c08e9a82d5b27af751beab6dec176a3 (poolsz 12)
2014-03-18 23:04:05 received getdata for: tx c8399d5501a7f500fdb6cdca5e79dfd3e215a99db8ac6c8c9fdb46bf1f780218
2014-03-18 23:04:05 received getdata for: tx 446326736662285a2f67c991981927cc1c08e9a82d5b27af751beab6dec176a3
2014-03-18 23:04:08 trying connection 67.215.11.122 lastseen=0,0hrs
2014-03-18 23:04:08 connected 67.215.11.122
2014-03-18 23:04:08 send version message: version 70002, blocks=35945, us=91.236.116.103:12908, them=67.215.11.122:9999, peer=67.215.11.122:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:09 socket closed
2014-03-18 23:04:09 disconnecting node 67.215.11.122
2014-03-18 23:04:15 trying connection 23.21.204.34:9999 lastseen=359773,3hrs
2014-03-18 23:04:15 connected 23.21.204.34:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:15 send version message: version 70002, blocks=35945, us=91.236.116.103:12908, them=23.21.204.34:9999, peer=23.21.204.34:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:15 socket closed
2014-03-18 23:04:15 disconnecting node 23.21.204.34:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:16 trying connection 67.215.11.122:9999 lastseen=359773,3hrs
2014-03-18 23:04:16 connected 67.215.11.122:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:16 send version message: version 70002, blocks=35945, us=91.236.116.103:12908, them=67.215.11.122:9999, peer=67.215.11.122:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:16 socket closed
2014-03-18 23:04:16 disconnecting node 67.215.11.122:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:16 trying connection 54.248.227.151:9999 lastseen=359773,3hrs
2014-03-18 23:04:17 connected 54.248.227.151:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:17 send version message: version 70002, blocks=35945, us=91.236.116.103:12908, them=54.248.227.151:9999, peer=54.248.227.151:9999
2014-03-18 23:04:17 socket closed
2014-03-18 23:04:17 disconnecting node 54.248.227.151:9999

getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
what does this mean?

Πάντα ῥεῖ
Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm

eduffield (OP)

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036

Dash Developer

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 11:05:28 PM

#9435

Quote from: coins101 on March 18, 2014, 11:04:02 PM

Quote from: eduffield on March 18, 2014, 10:55:35 PM

Quote from: coins101 on March 18, 2014, 10:38:12 PM

Quote from: eduffield on March 18, 2014, 10:10:24 PM

Quote from: taoway on March 18, 2014, 09:45:44 PM

I submitted a reply to that guy with all of the crazy comments, including the whitepaper and they deleted it too. I'm going to try just replying, maybe it's the link

https://twitter.com/jonmatonis

I would tweet him, but I've tried to post on coindesk to respond to preferrous and everything I write gets deleted. Why would they censor everything I say?

They have a moderation process for first time posts and adding links. If you email them they will manually check and respond: Keith Horwood: keith at coindesk dot com

Thanks

Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io

cshlock

Newbie

Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 0

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 11:06:08 PM

#9436

As the first anonymous coin, shouldn't the price be higher? It's getting frustrating seeing it so stagnant after I have continually sunk so much money into it. At first glance it looks like price manipulation, but I could be wrong. Anyone else want to chime in on this?

sippsnapp

Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 11:07:12 PM

#9437

Quote from: cshlock on March 18, 2014, 11:06:08 PM

rome wasnt built in a day Wink

Πάντα ῥεῖ
Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm

humanitee

Hero Member

Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 502

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 11:08:40 PM

#9438

Quote from: cshlock on March 18, 2014, 11:06:08 PM

1) It's in beta.
2) Due to (1) there is little marketing going on.
3) Super early adopters made huge gains and are no doubt locking some profits.

▄▄▄██████▄▄▄ ▄███▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄ █▄▄ ▄▄ ▀▀████▄ ██▄ █████▄ ▀█████ ██▄ ▄█████████ ▀█████ ███▄ ▄█████████▀▀ ▀█████ ███▄ ▄███ █████ ▀█████ ████ ███ █████ █████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ████ ███ █████ ▄████ ████ ███ █████ ███████████ ▀██ █████▄ █████████ ▀██ ██████▄ ▀█████ ▀██ ███████ ▀▀▀ ▀██ ██████▄▄ ▀██ ██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀ ▀▀ █████████████████▀ ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀▀

INJECTIVE
P R O T O C O L

Fast, Secure, and Fully

Decentralized Trading

BACKED BY:
─────────────────────────

BINANCE
─────── LAB & █████████████████████████████████ █ ███ █▀ ▀█ ███▀▀▀▀▀████████ ████▀▀███▀ █ █ █████ ▄▄▄▄▄ █ ▀ █ ███ █ ██ █▄ ▀█ ██ █ ▄███ ██████ ███ █████ █ ██ ███ █ ████ ████ ▄ ███ █▄ ▄█▄ ▄█▄ ▀ ████▄ ▄█ ██ ██ ████████████████████████████████████████

BOUNTY

▄▄████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀ ▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄█ ▄▄▄ █▄ ▄█ ▄▄▄████ █▄ █ ▄▄▄████▀████ █ █ ▀██████▀ ▄████ █ █ ▀██▀ ▄█████ █ █ ▀ ▄████ █ ▀█ ██▀██ █▀ ▀█ █ ▀█ █▀ ▀█▄ ▄█▀ ▀██▄▄ ▄▄██▀ ▀▀████▀▀

ANN

▄▄███████▄▄ ▄██▀▀ ▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄█ ▄▄▄ █▄ ▄█ █▄ ██▄▀ █▄ █ ███▄▄ ▄███▀ █ █ ██████████ █ █ █████████ █ █ ▀██████ █ ▀█ ▄████▀ █▀ ▀█ ▄▄████▀▀ █▀ ▀█▄ ▄█▀ ▀██▄ ▄▄██▀ ▀▀█████▀▀

Whitepaper
Medium
Reddit

coins101

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 11:10:37 PM

#9439

Quote from: humanitee on March 18, 2014, 11:08:40 PM

Quote from: cshlock on March 18, 2014, 11:06:08 PM

1) It's in beta.
2) Due to (1) there is little marketing going on.
3) Super early adopters made huge gains and are no doubt locking some profits.

You have to get an informal nod of approval from the community elders before you are allowed permission to go to the moon.

chaeplin

Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250

Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | No Premine | Hard Fork At 34140 (DGW)

March 18, 2014, 11:11:09 PM

#9440

Quote from: sippsnapp on March 18, 2014, 11:04:45 PM

while checking my darkcoin-qt debug log i found these :

getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
what does this mean?

connected peer want new block from you, which you anounced.

Pages: « 1 ... 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 [472] 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 ... 7013 »

Page 471

Viewing Page: 472