I do not see much relevance here. Bitcoin and RADIO radios are quite different, why compare them to each other? . Thanks!

You're both missing the point.

Bitcoin to radio isn't the right analogy. It's the blockchain that has so much in common with radio as it does the combustible engine, the refrigerator, the television set, the airplane, the printing press, and the internet. It's a new technology, it's adoption will be slow at first and then booming because it takes time to generate the momentum of the people and the use cases for folks to realize how valuable it is, as a technology.

the answer to the why the AM/FM flippening occured.

AM was more wideband that was used to broadcast over large distances. FM was more localised. for instance here in the UK if your at the southrn english beaches you can listen to french AM radio stations. where as for FM if you drive just 20 miles out of town you may not hear your towns radio station any longer (unless they set up radio masts along your route)

many countries could only licence certain frequencies. and so if each town wanted their own frequency, on AM if a town wanted xxx frequency.. then that radio station would be heard hundreds of miles away. meaning a town just 100 miles away could not also use that same frequency because it would be cluttered by the other town. so allowing local towns to have their own radio stations were limited due to the clutter

so FM started to be more common for "local" radio stations and AM was used for "national" radio stations because the signal range(strength) of FM was less than AM.
back in the days before cellular phones. people used to talk to each other wirelessly via C.B radios. FM was used to talk to people locally and AM was for those who wanted to talk long distance

anyway. not sure why the FM/AM analgy applies to bitcoin. as i can think of better analogies

for us millenials wanting a comparison of FM/AM signals
FM=Wi-FI
AM=5G

.... and then i clicked the link and realised it was elwar trying to pump their FLAWED seastead campaign.... elwar. please please please tell m you learned something from the previous 2 years of you trying to promote the seastead money grab.

That's why everyone one of us and all users of bitcoin here in bitcoin forum trying to bringing up into popularity for the purpose of centralized making as one currency  through Decentralized Digital System. all success of bitcoin is only coming from us. so all of that situation regarding for limited client or machine if ever Bitcoin become primary use to all through the help of every people will provided someday.

imagine LN as DAB
and thats why segwit has the new address format of BC1q.. because LN is not a feature to make bitcoin great. LN is a new network where other currencies will use
litecoin=LC1q..
USD FIAT=USD1q..
GBP FIAT =GBP1q..

so dont think the devs are trying to strengthen bitcoin.. they are already stifling bitcoin by removin the fee priority formulae and causing fee wars
they stifled legacy blocksize by not allowing people to transact more than 1mb of tx's using true legacy bitcoin addresses
they are stifling efficient blockhashing speeds by not letting bitcoin use asicboost

thats right a new currency funded by the bankers behind cores paid devs will use miners that are 30% more efficient(secure) than bitcoin and allow more transactions than bitcoin

Wow. Interesting how everyone misses the whole point of the article being around the simulcast aspect of early AM/FM and how it relates to companies accepting traditional and crypto currencies.

It's about adoption, not about technology.

That's why the title says "early FM radio adoption"...not "early FM radio technology".

Ok, that's just what I learned in college about the history of FM but what do I know? I only have a degree in Telecommunications. I could have gone into more detail about Edwin Armstrong and his interesting life story of trying to get FM accepted but it doesn't really relate to Bitcoin and ends with him jumping to his death due to FM not succeeding.

As for the seastead. I put an example from my knowledge. If you have other examples of places that only accept crypto and don't accept fiat currencies I would love to hear about them since that is the whole point of the article...getting those companies out there.

As for your naysaying about Blue Frontiers (which has only been around for 1 year), I am sure that any seasteading project that came about you would not support due to "you didn't think about water!" (even though we have a team of 70+ very intelligent volunteers that are contributing their expertise in every minute detail that it is less about having information and ideas as it is narrowing things down. So unless you have an expertise in the field you're contributing your ideas about...it would likely already have been covered. We ended up turning away volunteers only allowing about 1 per week due to the large amount of people that want to contribute their ideas.
The project will happen with or without your approval. The founders opted for a small ICO with reserves released based upon results in the future as opposed to following the path of all other ICOs where you get a bunch of money for your project then never get around to it due to the amount of time you're spending on vacation or driving your lambo. The founders have been involved in seasteading since 2008, I've been involved since 2008. I retired and moved to Tahiti to help out with the project. The project is legit. You can scream scam all you want. We're too busy making it happen.

Your idea will be dismissed by most who are thinking on surface. But if you look carefully, there are a lot of differences.

Let us talk about the nature. One is related to finances and other is for entertainment. There is big difference between the two from the point of view of an average user. For instance, consider an average user on FB or Instagram, he is using these to pass his time and for some fun. But for someone with interest in internet marketing, it is more of a business opportunity. They will see the same platform differently.