<<  >> (p.2)
    Author Topic: Fractional Reserve Banking Approach on the Table for Corrupting Bitcoin Network?  (Read 3493 times)
    practicaldreamer
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 770
    Merit: 500


    View Profile
    January 22, 2014, 10:28:11 PM
     #21

    Is there no way of telling that a particular coin has its source in mining rather than a promissory note?

    Actual bitcoins only exist on the block chain. If your bitcoin is on the block chain, it's a bitcoin.

    If you accept a note claiming to be a bitcoin, yet you can not manipulate this coin on the block chain, you have a promissory note.

    Fractional reserve banking will be easier to keep in check with Bitcoin as we can always see actual bitcoins on the block chain. If a Bitcoin bank wishes to engage in FRB, it's users can demand the bank submit to audits by proving it controls a certain amount of bitcoins on the block chain. The beauty of the block chain is that it is a public ledger which can not be faked.

    Now banks can compete for their customer's business by offering good interest rates on deposited bitcoins which they will loan out, yet the customers have methods to keep the banks honest.

    Also, promissory notes will probably not be fungible with actual bitcoins (because it's so simple to tell them apart), the real thing will command a premium.

       This is an informative post and answers a few things I've been wondering about - so thanks.

     I suppose, then, the unknown becomes the extent of consumers demand for credit and/or interest and how much risk they are prepared to take on for that credit/interest. What would be deemed to be an acceptable "defict" in the level of a banks reserves ?

       I guess another factor is that the banking market could be wide open with BTC - globally. What would be to stop me from borrowing/depositing BTC with an overseas bank that I recognised to have a more solid balance sheet ?
        
Page 1
Viewing Page: 2