Its not very appealing when you give deadlines and threaten to take over the coin... Not to mention trying to get zacks coins blacklisted.

Edit: The dude (tx42) posted from his "ebt" alt account then deleted his shit when i called it out.

What are you talking about?

I accidentally posted from a dev team account and I regret it, trust me.

No, the only thing I deleted were the posts where I mistakenly posted with the dev team account. I do not speak for the dev team of the other coin, so I had to delete those posts.

Now that I'm logged in as me...

Look, the patch is designed to be neutral relative to the function of the coin. Patched clients and not patched clients can coexist on the same network. The blockchain is good. The difference is that patched clients will not reject valid blocks, making the synchronization go smoother and strengthen the network. If you don't like that or some of the features out of fear of the unknown, then don't apply them.

You have several real devs here, it seems like, that can look over the changes. They'll verify that I didn't change anything about the core parameters of the coin. The real thing I changed was some validation code that was causing problems.

I am just wondering why someone suddenly offering. A fix for free when we really needed it noone would do it??

I agree

Based on what people have already gained from his work with fixing the Blade code and upgrading the Noirshares code (I am a big fan of NRS so thank you for that), I am convinced that  tx42  can deliver to us a solid patch. And soon by the looks of it, which is great.

Since anything he submits will be proof-read by the existing team of developers, I don't see anything wrong with giving it a chance and trying out what he offers.

And furthermore, I don't really care about his personal reasoning behind providing us with a patch. I do care about ADT and the health thereof, however, so I am definitely going to try the solution he provides.

yet another alt account

I redownload the blockchain and the ADT v2.0 is work fine.
Synced and the transfer coin fine.

I recently was victim to a keylogger, and it led to sabotages on all of my exchange accounts  (lost about 2.5 BTC in total), but the hacker also got into my forum account here on BTC Talk. He then posted a thread in the Russian forums that contained links to trojans disguised as trader bots.

This was caught by a moderator, and my account was banned here on bitcointalk.org

I appealed the ban, but I received a generic answer for the admin 'theymos' that said:

"I very rarely recover accounts if you can't prove ownership as described above. There are alternative ways of proving ownership, but they take too much time. If I point you to this thread, you can't prove ownership properly, and then I ignore your future PMs, this means that I'm not going to recover your account. Create a new one."

All ban appeal requests are given the same answer, and it is a link to a thread with that ^ line. Link: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/497545.0


So I followed the advice given by 'theymos'  and I made a new account.

It really sucks because now I have a very low Activity number and thus it is easy for silly ignorant people to discredit me and make accusations of being an "alt account".

So I ask you, Zack Clark, are you silly or ignorant?

i have pm'd the PR from tx42 to Tranz he will look over it and then if its approved it will be added