You shouldn't use the term "influencer" because it is misleading the advertisers. You can't consider an influencer all the twitter accounts from here with 3k-4k followers that they got using AMF, Twend, or FF method. It's not going to bring something useful for their advertisers as the followers base have nothing related to cryptocurrency.
Yes, we shouldnt. Thats why all the social media accounts on our platfrom are being verified to avoid scam and aggregation.
Thats how this process looks like:
This is just selling social signals but far to be from "influencers"
Yes, we have a low threshold for bountyhunters to participate in campaigns, but our advertisers have an option to filter, select, and target activities/tasks on several types of hunters depending on the degree of their social influence. Simple bounty tasks, or "social signals" (reposts, likes, comments) are being tracked and payed automatically that significantly simplifies the process of running bounty campaigns, as there is no need to check any single activity manually. But such parts of marketing campaigns as articles, videos, translations etc. are being rewarded according to the rank of each influencer, so the advertiser can distribute the budget and manage the marketing campaign correspondingly to his goals.
