BTC only.

Down to .008.  Slowly drifting downwards as the new coins begin to lose their value.

We need another BTC surge to drag the altcoins upwards.

How many times have I told you guys that adding other algorithms will require a new pool?
Terk hasn't even perfectly configured this one yet, so stop asking.

Is it normal to experience so much Rejects (Rejected untracked stratum share from pool 0)?

 (5s):3.542M (avg):3.563Mh/s | A:68096  R:14848  HW:0  WU:5.7/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 76  LW: 1315  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to eu.clevermining.com diff 512 with stratum as user

 [2014-04-21 20:22:01] Rejected untracked stratum share from pool 0


I get those rejects in 30 minutes of mining and only on clevermining.com pools. I found some older posts that the problem was fixed, but I guess the problem reappeared 

The "Rejected Untracked Stratum Share" is what we call a fake reject. It's caused by a communication problem between the miner and the pool, and those shares are still accepted.


There is no such thing as gciminer. If you are talking about guiminer, it is not compatible with scrypt, unless you are using guiminer-scrypt.

Since Terk is so busy, he doesn't have time to add it to the FAQ lol.
I suppose so.
Anyway, I've been using CleverMining since beta, so I can answer most of the questions.

It's not an issue specific with clevermining: it's an issue with cgminer being multithreaded, and receiving responses out-of-order.  

word from ckolivas, dev/mod: https://109.201.133.195/index.php?PHPSESSID=5s5a3knh3kk00injrqp9ibfff5&topic=28402.msg2167883#msg2167883

this was posted on may, 2013.  this issue has been reported to current sgminer 4.1.x

there is no need to run scared as cgminer/sgminer is well documented. 

Yes, sorry, I write going on memory.

You are right, is guiminer-scrypt.


[/quote]

Well, the obvious fix is to not use guiminer-scrypt, since it is rubbish.
Use CGminer or SGminer.

I know all that but other people just digging in CM run like hell when they see fake rejects and no explanation in OP or site FAQ. Doesn't matter byt411 can answer people's question if people don't care to ask what's wrong and run away from CM at the sight of all those fake rejects. My point is Terk should explain this clearly in the site FAQ at least.