The one thing bitcoin does to a person is stimulate their creative brain to such an extent that they can't stop thinking about the possibilities and solutions surrounding bitcoin.

Well today is one of those moments for me and I realised that for bitcoin to succeed it needs to spread readily in the marketplace and be taken up by a great many more people than has currently been achieved.

One of the ways this is going to be possible is through ATM machines that are spread far and wide across the globe. Yes exchanges make it easier too to a degree. But what about miners?

The problem I perceived today is that if these massive mining farms have the intention of holding onto their mined coins, then they will only create a market with less liquidity and ultimately decrease the value of the coins they are holding.

I'd be interested to learn how gold miners and prospectors of times past dealt with this situation especially in the US where there was initially a shortage of money in the market and so demand was high for gold and silver money. Miners I presume would have been able to set the price at whatever they liked for a time thus making it so lucrative... that is until the marketplace had enough gold and silver in circulation to maintain a stable economy. Then it would have been a more competitive space where only the sellers of the shovels were making any money as the demand was no longer there.

So first there has to be the demand created by the consumer. Second there has to be the supply in terms of the miners selling their mined coins. Do you all think that bitcoin mining, supply and demand  etc... will work in a similar way as it did with old gold/silver did in economies that had a scarcity of money?

Perhaps Michael Parsons at bitcoinbyte would be best to answer this given his research. I'm still digesting his book.