<<  >> (p.6)
    Author Topic: [ANN]🌀 Blur Network(BLUR) 🌀 | PoW Cryptonight-Dynamic | CPU/Solo Mining | DPoW  (Read 41398 times)
    blurnetwork (OP)
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 209
    Merit: 9

    The Blur Network


    View Profile WWW
    July 11, 2018, 06:08:35 PM
     #101

    The asic, GPU resistance feature looks great but how much does a person mine on an old system?

    I failed to get a single block on AMD FX6300, although h/s is not bad

    I do not want to make a pool - I'm talking about some kind of decentralization, although the network capacity is unrealistically high - it's unclear what it supports. either himself on the GPU and ASIC

    I do not exclude the possibility that the developer produces coins (supports the network) on the GPU
    Too much power of the network, given that the coin was just launched.

    ============================================

    nethash: ~350 kH/s
    Prior to this, netnash was 550-600 kH/s
    1 ryzen 1700 get - 3 kH/s
    I do not think that the developer has 150 hi-end ryzen machines.
    Most likely there is somewhere there is a GPU miner







    You're incorrect, there.  I don't mine the currency myself, at all, apart from testing purposes.  I simply run the seed nodes with no mining in the background even.  There is a donate option, should you decide to put any of your HR toward my development fund... However, the donate option is disabled by default...

    The reason you are finding less blocks can be due to "luck" which is a component of randomness, or the fact that in any blockchain, the easiest to mine blocks are mined first.  As the network progresses, blocks become increasingly difficult to solve, on average.  With a similar hashrate on an i7-7700HQ, I have seen similar results on occasion.  It really does vary a bit.

    It can be unlock, but as with most other coins that get launched by an unknown person the launch has been well prepared in advance and hardware has been set up to get an advantage. That is how it usually works and we all know it.

    If you join my Discord server (or Telegram), I'm very transparent about being the sole individual behind this project.  I think that your opinion there is a gross generalization, as well as an inaccurate one.  If you believe that decentralized platforms are rigged to that extent, I'm not sure why you participate in supporting any network that would have practices such as those.  I wouldn't.

    Isn't it right to say that 99% of "decentralized" platforms are rigged due to some premine, instamine or shady initial distribution?


    What you referred to in your first post was a hidden design vulnerability hardcoded into a project.... that’s quite a different thing than a transparent and verifiable pre-mine, altogether. The wall of disinformation and deceit is the point of my contention with your first notion.
Page 5
Viewing Page: 6