could you please look into your zcoin pool?
Over the last few days i've gotten a maximum of ~70% of my hashrate credited by the pool. Usually i am even lower (40-50%).
I tested some other Pools and my hashrate was fine (only deviations you would expect).

Looking at my payout proves my point. I get around ~50-60% credited of what my hashrate should return when using MPH.
And as i said. I tested other Pools and the hashrate and payout are normal.

thanks in advance

   Type: {AMD, NVIDIA}

Miner          Algorithm                         Speed            BTC/Day         BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----          ---------                         -----            -------         ---------- ----
ClaymoreDual30 {Ethash, Sia} {29.69 MH/s, 445.36 MH/s} {0.00180, 0.00017} {0.06050, 0.00038} {MiningPoolHub-Ethereum, MiningPoolHub-Siacoin}
ClaymoreDual40 {Ethash, Sia} {27.04 MH/s, 540.81 MH/s} {0.00164, 0.00021} {0.06050, 0.00038} {MiningPoolHub-Ethereum, MiningPoolHub-Siacoin}
ClaymoreDual20 {Ethash, Sia} {28.48 MH/s, 284.83 MH/s} {0.00172, 0.00011} {0.06050, 0.00038} {MiningPoolHub-Ethereum, MiningPoolHub-Siacoin}
Claymore       Ethash                       29.71 MH/s            0.00180            0.06050 MiningPoolHub-Ethereum


   Type: AMD

Miner    Algorithm         Speed BTC/Day  BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----    ---------         ----- -------  ---------- ----
Claymore Equihash    293.84  H/s 0.00191 6,492.64478 MiningPoolHub-Zcash
Sgminer  Ethash       27.76 MH/s 0.00168     0.06050 MiningPoolHub-Ethereum
Sgminer  Equihash    210.90  H/s 0.00137 6,492.64478 MiningPoolHub-Zcash
Claymore Cryptonight 744.00  H/s 0.00103 1,377.73283 MiningPoolHub-Monero
Sgminer  Cryptonight 730.70  H/s 0.00101 1,377.73283 MiningPoolHub-Monero




   Status: Running

                    Speed Active                      Launched Command
                    ----- ------                      -------- -------
              156.40 KH/s 01 Days 01 Hours 04 Minutes Once     Bin\Lyra2z-CPU\cpuminer.exe -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://europe.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17025 -u
                                                               pornluver.multipoolminer -p x
{30.21 MH/s, 453.12 MH/s} 01 Days 01 Hours 04 Minutes Once     Bin\Ethash-Claymore\EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17020 -ewal
                                                               pornluver.multipoolminer -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -dpool hub.miningpoolhub.com:17022 -dwal
                                                               pornluver.multipoolminer -dpsw x -dcoin sc -dcri 30


MultiPoolMiner is 13% more profitable than conventional mining!

Miner                                              btc     usd
-----                                              ---     ---
MultiPoolMiner                                     0.00253 3.06008
{ClaymoreDual30-Ethash/Sia, CpuminerLyra2z-Lyra2z} 0.00224 2.71630

1. Is there a way to put power calculation in? For example, equihash consumes lower power than ethash. How to tell multipoolminer to do equihash instead?

What does it mean multipoolminer earns 13% more than conventional mining?

2. Also should we donate to multipoolminer? I don't mind. I just want to know what feature will I miss if I don't.

3. Is Sia coin always the best for claymore as the second coin for dual mining?

4. Multipool miner says I would make .00253 BTC. I wonder where does it get the number. It says if I use Ethash/Sia I would make .0024 BTC. Again, where is that number come from? This ClaymoreDual30 {Ethash, Sia} {29.69 MH/s, 445.36 MH/s} {0.00180, 0.00017} suggest that I would make only .00197 btc per day. Not .00253 btc per day.

Oh really sorry about the delay.
I'm working on various parts of pools.

I'll open DCR pool first.

I bought qubit hash to miningpoolhub about 18 hours ago. My software says that I should make 30% profit.

I bought at .026 per ghday/s. I like to say it's .026 per (86400 giga  hash) but 86400 is just 1 day per second.

 Miningpoolhub says that https://miningpoolhub.com/?page=home&normalize=none qubit worth .037 per ghday/s. It's for digibytequbit. Within 6 minutes a block is fine.

I got 5k digibytequbit. However, value of qubit drops to .015 ghday/s quickly.

Also 5k digibytequbit worths .002 BTC and I spent .015 to get it.

I am tracking where things fail.

digibyte qubit price is actually stable. Where can I check it's difficulty graph?

And then there's the issue.  I wonder if I am credited for mining at lower difficulty.

It seems that the game is to quickly mine got some blocks and stop when difficulty is higher.

We wanted to drop you a line and let you know DigiByte v6.14.2 has been officially released with 3 soft forks: https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/releases/tag/v6.14.2

Segwit activation can be tracked here:https://segwit.digiexplorer.info/

If we drop the assumption that
D
and
B
are fixed, this simple variant is not hopping-
proof. A participant’s contribution is determined by the current diffi
culty, while his reward is influenced by the future difficulty. Pool-hoppers can use knowledg
e of imminent difficulty adjustments to their advantage – joining when the difficulty is set to
decrease, and leaving when the difficulty is set to increase. Another simple variant, where t
he number of shares is chosen as a given multiple of the difficulty at the time a block is found, su
ffers from similar problems.  To be completely hopping-proof, the following method, called “unit-PPLNS”,
should be used:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.4980.pdf

So if I mine when difficulty is low, I am mining when difficulty is set to increase. That paper says I should be leaving. If N is small enough it's not a big issue. But small N means bigger variant.

What the paper suggest is the same with what I suggested

When a share is submitted, store two attributes for it – units, eq
ual to the value of p at the time it was submitted, and amplifier, equal to the value of B
at the time it was vsubmitted

So each share should have a weight. That weight doesn't depend only on difficulty of stratum pool but also the inverse difficulty of the network. p in that paper is 1/D.

After that it gets complex. I would say just pay proportional to the unit but the guy has this complex formula. I got to look that up yet. Basically they have the same constant and whether you're in range or not depends on the 1/D of the block finding time.

XMR pool is acting weird again. 

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

Bin\AMD-GenesisMining\sgminer.exe --api-listen -k groestlcoin -o stratum+ssl://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17004 -u pornluver.multipoolminer -p x --gpu-threads 2 --worksize 128 --intensity d

 It doesn't work. Any wrong settings?

Is this how to run sgminer?