I reported that a year ago :


Tried it when the site was down for maintenance due to security certificates expiration as Vod suggested then, it didn't work. Seems like it's still an issue
I got a timeout now

I realize I've mentioned it before, but I now run into it weekly so out of self-interest I'm posting a request:
Can BPIP re-check all userIDs it didn't index? I use BPIP to get userIDs for the usernames in theymos' Trust data dump, and just this week, 3 usernames (and userIDs) are missing from BPIP (which means I have to manually add them to update my Trust list viewer):
TYCOON_official
GOLD_official
usernetwork7248
My estimate is that at least a few tens of thousands of userIDs are missing. If you can check which (consecutive) userIDs are missing in your database, you can scrape those profiles to update them.

Around 10 days ago I warned about the difference in the the received merit and total merit score values. It's still off by one.

BPIP.org is showing that profiles 'Nando1970', 'Rubyjona' and 'GPT COIN' woke up at July 20, 2019.

But forum Security Log has information only about account 'Nando1970' for this period. What is the reason?


[BPIP] Nando1970

[BPIP] Rubyjona

[BPIP] GPT COIN

Moving the servers into a production domain, preparing for guaranteed service contracts.    Site will be down without warning.

iasenko, Initscri, LoyceV - I'll be updating this post with fixes/changes soon.  I'm not ignoring you. 

For a couple of months, I had noticed that on the BPIP site my actually activity level has shown that it has upgraded from 1932 to 1946 to 1960 to 1974 (current); however, when I click on activity rank, it shows my activity level to still be at 1932, and it looks like other members have not updated on that activity rank page, either.  Therefore the activity rank level appears to be showing wrong numbers for at least 4 activity upgrade cycles for most if not all of the members listed.  Mine, with a therein listed rating of 1932, is currently shown ranked as 179 on the activity rank page.  https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostactivity

Thanks. no problem.

Activity ranking seems to be working now, and I see that the activity ranking list is synchronized more accurately with the rest of the activity level data.

Why did this peter griffin guy put so much effort into this instead of building a real business?  It look good and all but dont think the effort is worth it.

No rush, I know it's easier/faster to make requests than actually implement them