+1

Mike's right, don't throw names around, it's not like they had anything to gain from it, they actually had more to lose than anyone else which brings me to my other point mazeltov myriad, we've just had our first fork and what happened ? exactly nothing because although cryptopools.eu held more than 50% of the scrypt hash power there were other 4 other algos working along with the rest of the 49% of scrypt which prevented the fork from doing any harm to myriad. no one else except the users that mined there has been affected by the fork and even in they're case it's not entirely the pool's blame because the fork was announced several hours ago in the thread and it was most likely noticeable within minutes of it happening(if I was mining scrypt I probably would have noticed instantly since I always monitor diffs on my block explorer). I'm not saying you guys desirve it I'm just pointing out what low impact a 51% attack has on myriad compared to other coins, even the big guns.

point two:


Myriad is a rose in a sea of rotting carcases, a breath of fresh air in a room full of farts, a fresh water lake in the middle of the sahara. It's being held back because it is hard to notice it when 20 hyped premined scam ipo coins emerge daily, but users who do notice it tend to stick around because as it happened to vertcoin people will eventually learn about myriad and see that it trully is the concept to unite the whole mining comunity under one coin, a huge step forward for the crypto currency world.