Strange. The last few posts seem to not understand the difference between ASIC and mulitpool at all.
Scrappy Do:
Nobody has made a single comment about excluding ASICs (that I remember) in the last several pages. In fact we've been supportive of ASICs. Then again, if you want to see 80+% of the algo you bought ASICs for go to multipools and be satisfied with less than 20% to split with other ASIC miners, have at it. My guess is your 1GH will be wasted on MYR as the multipools raid the blocks at low diff.
Zer0Sum:
Go back and read the posts. Nobody here is blaming the current price of MYR on multipools or ASICs. We all know the market's soft. This has been going on for months. Try actually reading the posts that describe the problem.
foodies:
Are you bipolar? First it's not an issue. Then maybe it's an issue. Then we know about it and are working on it. Then it's not an issue again because ASIC EVERYBODY INCLUDE. WTF dude? Nobody here had any intentions of excluding anybody in Scrappy's shoes. Preach full acceptance? Yeah, when multipool's incorporate algo switching and are generating 80% of all blocks on all algos, where will your acceptance level be then? We are trying to point out that if you don't look at this, YOU WILL CAUSE THIS COIN TO EXCLUDE EVERYONE BUT MINE 'N DUMP POOLS.
As someone once told me, sorry for the all caps, but I just feel like you're not getting the point.
Skein, Myr-Groestl, and Qubit are way more obscure than you think. There's no point for them to add switching just for these algos. They would not be getting any "bang for their buck", as I think only 1 other coin strictly uses Skein (Skeincoin), 1 other coin uses Myr-Groestl (QuebecCoin I think), and Qubit is used in all the X11 algorithms but I don't even know any coins using strictly Qubit? There's no incentive for a damn long time for multipools to add Myr's other 3 algos to their platforms-which may be even MORE of a reason not to switch to popular algorithms?
neuro its the general point being made that needs to be taken seriously.
There is no predicting specifics here.
The example provided is a possible outcome.. you must see the line between now and tomorrow.
right now we are getting hit hard by MPs.. the one best exemplifying this point is CEX.IO. Do you think they will stop or Slow down their pace toward higher profits at the expense of those who have no foresight to plan ahead?
Look at the damage already being caused.
Do you think it will get any better or continue faster and faster?
How anyone look at the blockchain and say that something like this is going to stop once a higher hashrate is obtained?
CEX.IO regularly obtains 40%+ SHA256 hashrate in the bitcoin space. What is stopping them from the equivalent to litecoin?
Do you really think it is not within the realm of possibility they may redirect a significant portion of hashingpower to a future multipool?
We have a multi-algo profit switcher. what is stopping them from making a GPU friendly version of a multi-algo-multi-coin pool?
Look again. Look all around you.
There are those in the past who said comercial flight was not possible, impossible most households will soon have personal computers in them.
Look again.. take some time and consider: what if we are right.
You must understand this.
