The problem is that they knew and knew for some time - joint statements are not written at night or weekends.
Obviously they have been in the loop for some time, but we can't know if we're talking about hours, days, months or even years. We just don't know. Pasting conspiracy theories over this does not give more credit to your claim IMHO.
They are part of this because all of this falls made them profit in fees and whatsoever but they could've just saved face of the protocol and said that they believe MtGox is insolvent or practices controversial financial instruments.
Again, we don't know (if they shut up because they were greedy, because of this, of that... or because anyone who has done his research would never deposit a single dollar or bitcoin in an exchange that has been delaying withdrawals for months, partly in the open).
Like it or not, presenting suspicions as facts amounts to FUD. Moreover, even if they knew, it doesn't mean that they had the right to publicly disclose anything. And even if they had the right, they certainly didn't have any obligation. I believe that Bitcoin should be left to free market, and that regulation should be left to the government when it fails to be implemented by the protagonists themselves as a framework to that same free market.
Imagine the FUD coming out of WSJ, nasdaq.com and others when they start to dig into this?
It really seems we have opposing definitions of FUD. For me, seeking to uncover the truth and exposing it is the opposite of FUD.
The exchange transparency MUST BE IMPLEMENTED ASAP. All exchanges must send funds to their one wallet and announce it on their websites with dynamic response.
I agree with you, and I am optimistic about voluntary implementation of this by major, professional exchanges in the near future.