Has anyone looked at the activity on the block explorer
http://coin.ww9.me/?The two master addresses that contained all the coins started sending out peoples stake but instead of sending out coins and setting the change address as their own, they are creating a new address for the remaining 499,000, then 498,000, etc.
So for every stake that gets sent out, the 500,000 coins changes addresses.
Surely it is easier to code the system to set the change address as its own and repeat the procedure using the next variable data (user address) in the list.
Obviously having a single address that sends out coins would be more fair and transparent wouldnt it?
What is the purpose of this other than to obfuscate the number of addresses holding coins?
When you send coins to 1 address and you have any remainder you get back it by default on a new address.
