I don't like politics into bitcoin, it doesnt combine for me.
To mix it with guns/violence/war its another level .
Bitcoin is permissionless, it is decentralized, lets focus on that, on technology not ideology.

Whenever a technology like Bitcoin or blockchain get related to politics it is bound to get a dirty reputation out of it. Whatever is happening with Cody Wilson and US government should not hamper the current market of Bitcoin or it's mass adoption. There will be people who will try to tarnish the reputation of BTC in every single step but we should be the one to promote it with a better image.

Yes, we have to focus on the fact that bitcoin is permissionless and decentralized but we can't also ignore what the OP said. I was also surprised when I read the article and no one know if Cody Rutledge Wilson or Cody Miller was actually Satoshi or not. However, I believe the author of the article study the habit of Cody with what was said about Satoshi in the pass before he make his conclusion cause the author work for Roger Ver and Cody and Ver almost have the past.
Mind you, Ver, Gavin and Cody both run for an election. Therefore, Ver and Gavin know who Satoshi really is and there's possibility that what the author said was truth.

Bitcoin definitely have a lot of utilization of it just like fiat currencies can be used for smuggling and charity for the same time. It's us to decide which one we should promote or try to show the next generation so that they can learn from it.

Excuse me? You're drawing comparisons between someone who would essentially enable everyone in the world to print weapons that could kill their fellow men, and someone else who created a system of exchange so people can send money from one another without having to pay a middleman? There's no relevance here.

Sure, they're both permissionless, decentralized, censorship-resistant. But the ends to the means is more important. The purpose of bitcoin is not violent. It is strictly to exchange money. The purpose of printing your own firearms is violent. Even if it is for "self-defense".

I think that bitcoin is such a thing that will relieve us from the affection of government and politics so it's more like rebellious system which will give a freedom of finances to those who will use it.

OP, Cody Wilson's case can go up the US Supreme Court if his lawyers know what they are doing. Larry Flynt won his case on free speech by calling on the First Amendment. I don't know if their cases can be considered the same, but the US, as a country, was built on free speech, the right to bear arms, etc to protect its citizens and prevent their government to become like their English masters before the Revolutionary War. I can't believe that will ever change anytime.

Bitcoin is now involved in many other sectors. i think is a good sign. Now transaction with bitcoin are increasing more. that make the bitcoin market more popular

Permissionless is bullshit, how many warehouses of ASICS , Do you Have?


Decentralized is bullshit, Chinese Miners have over 51% majority.


Censorship-resistant,  for the moment, unless you piss off the Chinese Miners.  


Should Cody Wilson be allowed to Place plans on how to build a 3d gun on the internet, Hell Yeah!
(But be aware the US has not been a free country since the corrupt bastards enacted the Income Tax System in 1913.)
(Any country where the TSA will molest your children & wife & you at an airport can hardly be called a free country.)

The only similarity between Satoshi and Cody Wilson is that they both did something that pissed off the government. You are

not allowed to "print" your own private money and you are not allowed to "print" a functional weapon in the USA. The

difference is, nobody knows who Satoshi is and they cannot charge a pseudonym for a crime, if they have no "criminal" to

prosecute.