Suspicion of a scam and unprofessionalism.
To make a decision, I need to know if there are any critical errors in the code.
How long will the audit be conducted?
http://swish.pw/https://etherscan.io/address/0x924fc576b7166e1a06e42340ec9c8e8405522789#codepragma solidity ^0.4.17;
/**
* @title ERC20Basic
* @dev Simpler version of ERC20 interface
* @dev see https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/179
*/
contract ERC20Basic {
uint256 public totalSupply;
function balanceOf(address who) public constant returns (uint256);
function transfer(address to, uint256 value) public returns (bool);
event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
}
/**
* @title ERC20 interface
* @dev see https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20
*/
contract ERC20 is ERC20Basic {
function allowance(address owner, address spender) public constant returns (uint256);
function approve(address spender, uint256 value) public returns (bool);
event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint256 value);
}
/**
* @title SafeMath
* @dev Math operations with safety checks that throw on error
*/
library SafeMath {
function mul(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
uint256 c = a * b;
assert(a == 0 || c a == b);
return c;
}
function div(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
// assert(b > 0);/ Solidity automatically throws when dividing by 0
uint256 c = a b;
// assert(a == b * c + a % b);/ There is no case in which this doesn't hold
return c;
}
function sub(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
assert(b <= a);
return a - b;
}
function add(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
uint256 c = a + b;
assert(c >= a);
return c;
}
}
/**
* @title Basic token
* @dev Basic version of StandardToken.
*/
contract BasicToken is ERC20Basic {
using SafeMath for uint256;
mapping(address => uint256) balances;
/**
* @dev transfer token for a specified address
* @param _to The address to transfer to.
* @param _value The amount to be transferred.
*/
function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value) public returns (bool) {
balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender].sub(_value);
balances[_to] = balances[_to].add(_value);
emit Transfer(msg.sender, _to, _value);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Gets the balance of the specified address.
* @param _owner The address to query the the balance of.
* @return An uint256 representing the amount owned by the passed address.
*/
function balanceOf(address _owner) public constant returns (uint256 balance) {
return balances[_owner];
}
}
/**
* @title Standard ERC20 token
*
* @dev Implementation of the basic standard token.
* @dev https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20
*/
contract StandardToken is ERC20, BasicToken {
mapping (address => mapping (address => uint256)) allowed;
/**
* @dev Aprove the passed address to spend the specified amount of tokens on behalf of msg.sender.
* @param _spender The address which will spend the funds.
* @param _value The amount of tokens to be spent.
*/
function approve(address _spender, uint256 _value) public returns (bool) {
// To change the approve amount you first have to reduce the addresses`
// allowance to zero by calling `approve(_spender, 0)` if it is not
// already 0 to mitigate the race condition described here:
// https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20#issuecomment-263524729
require((_value == 0) || (allowed[msg.sender][_spender] == 0));
allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = _value;
emit Approval(msg.sender, _spender, _value);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Function to check the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
* @param _owner address The address which owns the funds.
* @param _spender address The address which will spend the funds.
* @return A uint256 specifing the amount of tokens still available for the spender.
*/
function allowance(address _owner, address _spender) constant public returns (uint256 remaining) {
return allowed[_owner][_spender];
}
}
/**
* @title Ownable
* @dev The Ownable contract has an owner address, and provides basic authorization control
* functions, this simplifies the implementation of "user permissions".
*/
contract Ownable {
address public owner;
/**
* @dev The Ownable constructor sets the original `owner` of the contract to the sender
* account.
*/
function Ownable() public {
owner = msg.sender;
}
/**
* @dev Throws if called by any account other than the owner.
*/
modifier onlyOwner() {
require(msg.sender == owner);
_;
}
/**
* @dev Allows the current owner to transfer control of the contract to a newOwner.
* @param newOwner The address to transfer ownership to.
*/
function transferOwnership(address newOwner) onlyOwner public {
require(newOwner != address(0));
owner = newOwner;
}
}
/**
* @title Mintable token
* @dev Simple ERC20 Token example, with mintable token creation
* @dev Issue: * https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/zeppelin-solidity/issues/120
*/
contract MintableToken is StandardToken, Ownable {
event Mint(address indexed to, uint256 amount);
event MintFinished();
bool public mintingFinished = false;
modifier canMint() {
require(!mintingFinished);
_;
}
/**
* @dev Function to mint tokens
* @param _to The address that will recieve the minted tokens.
* @param _amount The amount of tokens to mint.
* @return A boolean that indicates if the operation was successful.
*/
function mint(address _to, uint256 _amount) onlyOwner canMint public returns (bool) {
totalSupply = totalSupply.add(_amount);
balances[_to] = balances[_to].add(_amount);
emit Mint(_to, _amount);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Function to stop minting new tokens.
* @return True if the operation was successful.
*/
function finishMinting() onlyOwner public returns (bool) {
mintingFinished = true;
emit MintFinished();
return true;
}
}
contract SWISH is MintableToken {
string public constant name = "SWISH";
string public constant symbol = "SWI";
uint32 public constant decimals = 18;
}
