in the future, will there really be a need for fiat currency? Government can collect taxes in crypto, determine how to allocate it, and spend it in crypto. Ppl can receive salaries and do all commerce using crypto. Loans can be done in crypto. Fundraising can be in crypto. Sure, problems have to be worked out in terms of scalability, does it have to be completely decentralized, etc, the value has to become more stable. But theoretically, is there any reason to have fiat in the future?

It has been established that governments can now do taxation without representation by printing more money (which is a tax on everyone holding the currency), instead of trying to get a bill passed that allows it to increase the tax rate. With crypto this would be no more. All increased taxation would have to pass a vote.

From an economic standpoint, the idea that a country can stimulate its economy by adjusting interest rates is tenuous. There is just as strong an argument that lowering interest rates has caused speculation and bubbles, with calamitous results. In a crypto market economy, capital will flow from where it is needed less to where it is needed more.

Currencies of individual states will exist until the need for them disappears. And this will be decided in all cases by the representative bodies of these states. The need for national money may disappear when uniting the economic and financial systems of different countries as it was done in the European Union. In all other cases, the currency of individual states will exist as long as the state exists.

Currencies of individual states will exist until the need for them disappears. And this will be decided in all cases by the representative bodies of these states. The need for national money may disappear when uniting the economic and financial systems of different countries as it was done in the European Union. In all other cases, the currency of individual states will exist as long as the state exists.

in the future, will there really be a need for fiat currency? Government can collect taxes in crypto, determine how to allocate it, and spend it in crypto. Ppl can receive salaries and do all commerce using crypto. Loans can be done in crypto. Fundraising can be in crypto. Sure, problems have to be worked out in terms of scalability, does it have to be completely decentralized, etc, the value has to become more stable. But theoretically, is there any reason to have fiat in the future?

It has been established that governments can now do taxation without representation by printing more money (which is a tax on everyone holding the currency), instead of trying to get a bill passed that allows it to increase the tax rate. With crypto this would be no more. All increased taxation would have to pass a vote.

From an economic standpoint, the idea that a country can stimulate its economy by adjusting interest rates is tenuous. There is just as strong an argument that lowering interest rates has caused speculation and bubbles, with calamitous results. In a crypto market economy, capital will flow from where it is needed less to where it is needed more.

Fiat currency is very significant in today's world. It has established an important role in different transactions ariund the world. Replacing fiat currency by cryptocurrency is still far frim reality. Cryptocurrency hasn't been that reliable in terms of consistency and security.

Even with the growth of crypto, I think it can not replace paper money. All governments in countries want to control their economies, if a society has only crypto money, how can they manage it? Moreover, in rural and remote areas where internet and computer are not available, paper money is still the most affordable.