Kerney666! I was wondering how long you'd stay mining Lyra2z under the radar 

Everyone is still waiting for Windows support due to the reduced power draw opportunities with the PPT registry mods. Doing this is Linux is still a nightmare.

Profitability has gone down a lot though; lots of hashrate migration from other coins, as you predicted. Which is probably why you've reappeared and have your name on a release 

I know you previously mentioned concern with GPL licenses or what not. The dev of MKXminer apparently doesn't have any such concern, and he just released a lyra2z mod of his miner. Your previously mentioned hashrates are much more competitive, but he will have some draw simply because his is available for Windows.

@kerney666

Wonderful! I'm excited to put it to the test and will keep tabs on this thread. There are enough other tools in windows to make up for any standard features in miner (such as temp monitoring, core and mem clocking, etc.), so don't think that's as much of a concern for windows miners, and I hope you won't delay any release because of that.

That makes sense in regard to MKX; his prior Lyra2rev2 miner had lower apparent hashrate in the miner because the rest was going to devfee. If he accidently posted the real numbers, the difference is probably also going to dev fee (which makes for a pretty high devfee %!).

Also, I have to ask, and not trying to tread on any toes, just seeking clarity: on your prior thread you mentioned the possibility of Vega 64's with up to 10.5 MH/s using your GCN ASM kernel. Are the currently lower posted numbers due to: 1. devfee for future windows release actually being >3%; 2. current kernel used is not as powerful as your prior kernel; 3. numbers posted will be updated in the future for a possibly faster assembly kernel?? (hope it's 3  )

Thanks for responding, good to see you in the forum again! 

Annoying as well is the fact he drops his (buggy) miner onto the forums, and the hashrate people achieve is quite a bit off what he claims... and then he disappears.

doing tests with this miner, here I leave the results
GPU0 Asus rogstrix evo rx560 4gb
GPU1 MSI gaming rx580 4gb
GPU2 MSI armor rx480 4gb
GPU3 MSI Armor rx470 4gb
GPU4 MSI Amor 570 8gb

these are the results when extracting LUXCOIN

[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 2.220Mh/s (2.216Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 1 - phi2: 4.766Mh/s (4.752Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 2 - phi2: 4.355Mh/s (4.346Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 3 - phi2: 4.279Mh/s (4.274Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 4 - phi2: 4.223Mh/s (4.274Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats Total - phi2: 19.844Mh/s (19.861Mh/s)

but if I try to extract other coins from the something phi2 throws an error

Pool eu.bsod.pw successfully subscribed.
[2018-09-14 10:50:51] Pool eu.bsod.pw authorization succeeded.
[2018-09-14 10:50:51] Pool eu.bsod.pw set difficulty to 1.000000
[2018-09-14 10:50:51] Pool eu.bsod.pw failed to parse server rpc: {"id":null,"method":"mining.notify","params":["910","17747d5c843cbfa080ced42945ff11a0db3b1d54e64124b210228d4600000000","01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff1b02aa3b04a6ca9b5b08","62736f642e736f6c6f00000000000232c4eb0b000000001976a914f47f5396f1b4e8e662d1fad73 07b32805d84994788ac4ba6e111000000001976a9148810a5dac6c6216192420ae23f6f48a4fdf6 6b9188ac00000000",["6e42aeaebc5e15d6bd3f7fabb4d6f84addeb526e424b78376f274a9f16297cc4"],"20000000","1c123e5a","5b9bcaa6",true]}

./teamredminer -a phi2 -o stratum+tcp://eu.bsod.pw:2436 -u AX8iyvLTQL16DLSSm95ry8cKwfqvorTpfs -p c=MIA

I try to extract MixAir to take advantage of the low difficulty but I throw that error, I have already tried in other pools and also the same...

@edwinosky

Ah, look at that, another phi2 coin. Ok, so we need to release a new version that supports both 80 bytes and 144 bytes block header for phi2 in order to support MIA. Will keep you posted.

@kerney666 thank you friend, I'll be attentive to updates

@SigiSinatra

Memclk is a tad more important for phi2, but really not much. You could potentially lose a few pct points by downclocking it too much. On the other hand, a few saved watts might be the better choice, YMMV. Testing on your own cards with a wattmeter and knowing your $/kwh price is probably the best way to go.

Nice to have you back, todxx. I thought you had abandoned your miner.

My Vega 64 gets 6.5 MH. I also have performance intentionally restricted to make it run cooler (any significant amount of fan noise just annoys everyone in my house), so that number is probably lower than what other people get.