Maybe they do not want to show their documents.

From this point of view I agree with you.
But what for most of projects set up high target of hard cap? I've seen only 1 ICO with big hard cap which has bring profit to investors. It is Tezos

I think that they will suceed in raising soft cap and then it depends on their marketing plan and showing us some proof of work whether it is possible or not to achieve hard cap

As far as I know do not have at the moment.

The sale does not start yet, I think we will see many changes on the main site and the whole project until the beginning of the sales.

I would not hope for a partner. Project Victorieum must independently release its product. And then he will dictate the conditions to market players and choose his partners.

As I understand it, if someone does not hold ICO standards, then problems arise? but nothing was terrible here, the team keeps the rules

Mates, are there any official stuff to answer our questions about project?
So many questions here remains without any official response

Representatives of the Victorieum project are very active in Telegraph and in Discord. They also drop in and read our discussions on this forum.

To be honest, I am glad that the control over the holding of ICO companies is growing. I hope that in this way scam and fraud in this area will either disappear altogether or become many times smaller. And again, investors will have more confidence in projects.