This is a little off-topic but I'll give you my two cents. True democracy has one issue and that's mob rule. 51% of the population could insist the minority give up all their property for no reason what so ever. With that being said there needs to be a checks and balances system with a distributed body of power but safe guards and protections for basic human liberties. Essentially a list of unalienable rights like the US constitution. Systems should not force or interfere with governments. Rather the people and governments should utilize systems like Sentivate as tools during the democratic process. It's important to note that Sentivate is not a solely decentralized network as such networks are entirely unrealistic if seeking to replace existing services and systems. As such Sentivate may be the only current project capable of being a viable tool for the democratic processes in government. Because of its centralized bits it has protections against 51% attacks regardless of the size of the network. True democracy isn't realistic having a checks and balances system like the US and a constitution is the best course of action.

As a side note Sentivate has a set of rules that will be implemented on the network to limit things such as spam and to help categorize domains.