<<  >> (p.145)
    Author Topic: [ANN] TeamRedMiner v0.10.10 - Ironfish/Kaspa/ZIL/Kawpow/Etchash and More  (Read 212662 times)

    • Dojo76
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 30
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    February 11, 2022, 10:58:11 AM
     #2881
    Quote from: eggs369 on February 06, 2022, 04:59:03 AM
    Agreed ETH+TON on TRM would be great.  Anyone know if that's on the horizon?

    Dual mining with TON implemented in latest version 0.92 but not working for me with pool.services.tonwhales.com. I tried this string:

    --ton -o stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 -u <ton wallet>.<worker name> -p x --ton_end

    Also tried to specify the dialect with "--ton_pool_mode=toncoinpool"

  • sxemini
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1556
    Merit: 74


    View Profile
    February 11, 2022, 11:13:16 AM
    Last edit: February 11, 2022, 12:04:51 PM by sxemini
     #2882
    Quote from: Dojo76 on February 11, 2022, 10:58:11 AM
    Quote from: eggs369 on February 06, 2022, 04:59:03 AM
    Agreed ETH+TON on TRM would be great.  Anyone know if that's on the horizon?

    Dual mining with TON implemented in latest version 0.92 but not working for me with pool.services.tonwhales.com. I tried this string:

    --ton -o stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 -u <ton wallet>.<worker name> -p x --ton_end

    Also tried to specify the dialect with "--ton_pool_mode=toncoinpool"



    Where you find this url stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 for the pool connection?
    The connection is https://server1.whalestonpool.com or i am wrong?

    EDIT:

    https://pool.services.tonwhales.com

    Teamredminer only supports 2 pools at the moment - stratum+tcp://ton.hashrate.to:4002 and stratum+tcp://pplns.toncoinpool.io:443/stratum


    Test with my 6900xt - 61mh on ETH and 5gh/s on TON | lolminer - ETH 61mh and 3,75gh/s on TON

  • Dojo76
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 30
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    February 11, 2022, 01:54:12 PM
     #2883
    Quote from: sxemini on February 11, 2022, 11:13:16 AM
    Quote from: Dojo76 on February 11, 2022, 10:58:11 AM
    Quote from: eggs369 on February 06, 2022, 04:59:03 AM
    Agreed ETH+TON on TRM would be great.  Anyone know if that's on the horizon?

    Dual mining with TON implemented in latest version 0.92 but not working for me with pool.services.tonwhales.com. I tried this string:

    --ton -o stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 -u <ton wallet>.<worker name> -p x --ton_end

    Also tried to specify the dialect with "--ton_pool_mode=toncoinpool"



    Where you find this url stratum+tcp://pool.services.tonwhales.com:443 for the pool connection?
    The connection is https://server1.whalestonpool.com or i am wrong?

    EDIT:

    https://pool.services.tonwhales.com

    Teamredminer only supports 2 pools at the moment - stratum+tcp://ton.hashrate.to:4002 and stratum+tcp://pplns.toncoinpool.io:443/stratum


    Test with my 6900xt - 61mh on ETH and 5gh/s on TON | lolminer - ETH 61mh and 3,75gh/s on TON

    Yep, unsupported pool at the moment, working with ton.hashrate.to:4002.

    I suppose I'll be paid by the pool on the TON wallet when payout is reached for ETH but not 100% sure

  • abrgeza
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 117
    Merit: 2


    View Profile
    February 13, 2022, 08:37:32 AM
     #2884
    TRM v0.9.2.1 eth+ton works good on Navi cards, much better than lolminer.
    Still waiting for Vega and Polaris support.

  • Dung-beetle_Lives_Matter
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 16
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    February 15, 2022, 02:54:15 AM
     #2885
    Dear Dev, please add 'pool.services.tonwhales.com:443' support to your sweet miner as soon as possible, please!
    lolMiner sucks!

  • mineozzie
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 5
    Merit: 1


    View Profile
    February 17, 2022, 10:28:24 AM
     #2886
    Dear dev,

    Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
    Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..

  • sxemini
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1556
    Merit: 74


    View Profile
    February 17, 2022, 10:32:14 AM
     #2887
    Quote from: mineozzie on February 17, 2022, 10:28:24 AM
    Dear dev,

    Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
    Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..

    They are working on it. Good things need time.

  • waywoos2
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 62
    Merit: 2


    View Profile
    February 22, 2022, 02:02:23 AM
     #2888
    Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on.  Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual  mining. I get full ton hashrate however.  Any experts?

  • sxemini
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1556
    Merit: 74


    View Profile
    February 22, 2022, 01:34:07 PM
     #2889
    Quote from: waywoos2 on February 22, 2022, 02:02:23 AM
    Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on.  Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual  mining. I get full ton hashrate however.  Any experts?

    Without any information - no one can help you. OS, Driver, Commandline, OC settings and so on or you think we all have a glass sphere?

    Soc is 0 for polaris GPU´s

    31mh on phönix are inflated hashrate - in real are 2 -5% less - TRM give more poolside hashrate

    maybe first start with eth mining only on TRM - if this work than you can add the TON parameters.

  • waywoos2
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 62
    Merit: 2


    View Profile
    February 22, 2022, 03:05:32 PM
     #2890
    Quote from: sxemini on February 22, 2022, 01:34:07 PM
    Quote from: waywoos2 on February 22, 2022, 02:02:23 AM
    Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on.  Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual  mining. I get full ton hashrate however.  Any experts?

    Without any information - no one can help you. OS, Driver, Commandline, OC settings and so on or you think we all have a glass sphere?

    Soc is 0 for polaris GPU´s

    31mh on phönix are inflated hashrate - in real are 2 -5% less - TRM give more poolside hashrate

    maybe first start with eth mining only on TRM - if this work than you can add the TON parameters.


    Using win 11. Drivers are 19.1.1.  A little dated but has worked great for me with Polaris.  Using standard 1200/2150.  It works great on my other rig with a 5700 5600 and 580 mix. 

  • Shivoreun
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 130
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    February 22, 2022, 10:15:34 PM
     #2891
    Hi to all.
    Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo Sad Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.
    The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.

    Sorry for a long post...
    Code:
    1)There is a fully automated tuning of TRM, no additional options defined, all the miner defaults:

    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU PCIe      CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct  TMem  FanPct  FanRpm  VDDC   Power  ETH Cfg
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] 0   01:00.0   32  1250    0      2050   48C   48C   48C   54.00%  2152    893 mV  98 W  A64 (1.00)
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] 1   02:00.0   32  1245    0      2015   47C   47C   47C   48.00%  1959    906 mV  99 W  A64 (1.00)
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] 2   03:00.0   32  1175    0      2000   49C   49C   49C   57.00%  1594    900 mV  89 W  A64 (1.00)
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] 3   06:00.0   32  1270    0      2050   49C   49C   49C   57.00%  2243    893 mV 100 W  A64 (1.00)
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] 4   07:00.0   36  1245    0      2025   47C   47C   47C   48.00%  1916    875 mV  98 W  A64 (1.00)
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49]
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:03:18
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  0 [48C, fan 54%]      ethash: 3.951Mh/s, avg 3.252Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  1 [47C, fan 48%]      ethash: 4.022Mh/s, avg 3.690Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  2 [49C, fan 57%]      ethash: 3.849Mh/s, avg 3.190Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  3 [49C, fan 57%]      ethash: 745.1kh/s, avg 637.4kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  4 [47C, fan 48%]      ethash: 731.3kh/s, avg 625.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total                      ethash: 13.30Mh/s, avg 11.39Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] eu.ezil.me                 ethash: 13.14Mh/s, avg 11.17Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  0 [48C, fan 54%]      ton: 921.4Mh/s, avg 804.3Mh/s, pool 2.218Gh/s a:2 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  1 [47C, fan 48%]      ton: 917.9Mh/s, avg 796.6Mh/s, pool 1.111Gh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  2 [49C, fan 57%]      ton: 860.8Mh/s, avg 746.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  3 [49C, fan 57%]      ton: 967.8Mh/s, avg 774.7Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  4 [47C, fan 48%]      ton: 1.075Gh/s, avg 846.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total                      ton: 4.743Gh/s, avg 3.968Gh/s, pool 3.329Gh/s a:3 r:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 4.943Gh/s, avg 3.876Gh/s, pool 3.327Gh/s a:3 r:0
    [2022-02-22 23:52:49] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2)Next step, I trying to set --dual_intensity=0.25 to get a 75% of GPU power directed to primary algo ETC
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU PCIe      CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct  TMem  FanPct  FanRpm  VDDC   Power  ETH Cfg
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] 0   01:00.0   32  1250    0      2050   44C   44C   44C   42.00%  1807    893 mV  68 W  A128 (0.25)
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] 1   02:00.0   32  1245    0      2015   42C   42C   42C   36.00%  1593    906 mV  80 W  A128 (0.25)
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] 2   03:00.0   32  1175    0      2000   44C   44C   44C   42.00%  1184    900 mV  70 W  A128 (0.25)
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] 3   06:00.0   32  1270    0      2050   43C   43C   43C   39.00%  1697    893 mV  79 W  A128 (0.25)
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] 4   07:00.0   36  1245    0      2025   42C   42C   42C   36.00%  1542    875 mV  75 W  A128 (0.25)
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07]
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:07:49
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  0 [44C, fan 42%]      ethash: 710.2kh/s, avg 665.8kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  1 [42C, fan 36%]      ethash: 4.025Mh/s, avg 3.760Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  2 [44C, fan 42%]      ethash: 3.900Mh/s, avg 3.775Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  3 [43C, fan 39%]      ethash: 755.0kh/s, avg 711.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  4 [42C, fan 36%]      ethash: 740.6kh/s, avg 698.3kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total                      ethash: 10.13Mh/s, avg 9.610Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] eu.ezil.me                 ethash: 9.731Mh/s, avg 9.506Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  0 [44C, fan 42%]      ton: 475.4Mh/s, avg 449.9Mh/s, pool 1.329Gh/s a:3 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  1 [42C, fan 36%]      ton: 465.6Mh/s, avg 454.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  2 [44C, fan 42%]      ton: 436.0Mh/s, avg 422.8Mh/s, pool 443.5Mh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  3 [43C, fan 39%]      ton: 481.1Mh/s, avg 461.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  4 [42C, fan 36%]      ton: 538.5Mh/s, avg 525.1Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total                      ton: 2.397Gh/s, avg 2.313Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 2.268Gh/s, avg 2.283Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
    [2022-02-22 23:37:07] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As you can see, the secondary algo hashrate goes down, but at the same time there is no increase of h/r in primary algo Sad
    Any ideas, what I need to tune, to get the normal hashes, please?..
    Thanks.
    P.S. Sorry for errors in English - it's not my native language...

  • hbouma
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 22
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    February 23, 2022, 12:44:15 AM
     #2892
    Quote from: Shivoreun on February 22, 2022, 10:15:34 PM
    Hi to all.
    Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo Sad Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.
    The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.

    Yeah, I'm having the same issue. Reducing the dual intensity does lower the TON hashrate, but doesn't do anything for the ETH hashrate. I guess we'll have to wait for fixes.

    Hal

  • Shivoreun
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 130
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    March 04, 2022, 11:26:14 AM
     #2893
    Hi.

    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5059817.msg59332215#msg59332215

    Any solution for this problem?.. Sad
    P.S. Sorry for errors in English - it's not my native language...

  • sxemini
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1556
    Merit: 74


    View Profile
    March 04, 2022, 11:30:00 AM
     #2894
    Quote from: Shivoreun on March 04, 2022, 11:26:14 AM
    Hi.

    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5059817.msg59332215#msg59332215

    Any solution for this problem?.. Sad

    Did you activate compute mode on your RX570? And your TON hashrate is to high, this cause the low ETC performance also.
    I tested it on 2x RX470 - without tweaking i get 29.5mh ETC and around 600mh on TON.

    Ok i read your compute mode is on. I use the ETH config A160.


    AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
    You must delete the command:  --eth_dag_cache=0

  • Dojo76
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 30
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 04, 2022, 11:23:56 PM
     #2895
    In v0.9.4 dual mining is super improved, TON+ETH is more stable, higher hashrate compared to previous versions and more shares (Hiveon +3/4%).

    Kudos to the developers for the great job, it's good to see how skilled programmers can still add value to an almost perfect product 

     

  • Shivoreun
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 130
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    March 06, 2022, 12:53:33 PM
     #2896
    Quote from: sxemini on March 04, 2022, 11:30:00 AM
    AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
    You must delete the command:  --eth_dag_cache=0

    Thank you for reply!
    Yes, I'am using tripple mining Cheesy ETC+ZIL+TON (ezil.me)
    There is no --eth_dag_cache=0 key present, but I've also tried to add it, and no result Sad Now trying to play with --eth_4g_max_alloc, but still no result.
    P.S. Sorry for errors in English - it's not my native language...

  • batsonxl
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1215
    Merit: 30


    View Profile
    March 06, 2022, 04:38:41 PM
     #2897
    Thanks for TON. Can you please add ALPH too?

  • sxemini
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1556
    Merit: 74


    View Profile
    March 07, 2022, 08:27:12 AM
     #2898
    Quote from: Shivoreun on March 06, 2022, 12:53:33 PM
    Quote from: sxemini on March 04, 2022, 11:30:00 AM
    AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
    You must delete the command:  --eth_dag_cache=0

    Thank you for reply!
    Yes, I'am using tripple mining Cheesy ETC+ZIL+TON (ezil.me)
    There is no --eth_dag_cache=0 key present, but I've also tried to add it, and no result Sad Now trying to play with --eth_4g_max_alloc, but still no result.

    Try ETC+TON only first or only ETC.

  • tornvidia
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 3
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 09, 2022, 10:44:07 AM
     #2899
    Hello, can someone tell me where I can change intesity in teamred miner(I am using the latest verison). I have rx 6900xt, mining ETH+TON in Windows, but when I am mining my system works very slow, what can do with it? If I use nbminer for ETH mining I have 0 problems even playing some simple games!

  • sxemini
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1556
    Merit: 74


    View Profile
    March 09, 2022, 10:58:57 AM
     #2900
    Quote from: tornvidia on March 09, 2022, 10:44:07 AM
    Hello, can someone tell me where I can change intesity in teamred miner(I am using the latest verison). I have rx 6900xt, mining ETH+TON in Windows, but when I am mining my system works very slow, what can do with it? If I use nbminer for ETH mining I have 0 problems even playing some simple games!

    TON is very GPU intensive, so i think this is normal. And no Teamredminer has no intensity paramater, you can play with --eth_config (more information in teamredminer folder or github) - but for sure the pool hashrate is much higher than nbminer. nbminer inflated the hashrate up to 5%.
    Pages: « 1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 146 147 148 149 150 151 »
      Print  
Page 144
Viewing Page: 145

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com