Well that graph relates to BTC being like
insurance underwriters such as Lloyds of London and therefore with unlimited liability for all costs associated to network operation to an extent they will owe 666 dollars. It really dont work like this
so we good
Also the backwards time loop part of the graph poses questions, I have no link for that one
The ancient ownership of listed banks and some other Public companies was of this nature a while ago, the directors were liable for its losses. If directors got a bonus or whatever pay, it was all returnable if the bank was failing. Of course this never happens now except with sole traders, who should be very careful.
The one thing that could and should have been done in 2008 was a bonus is only payable in your own banks shares and it goes into the employees pension. Thats twenty years of a hell of alot of inside people who want that bank to play properly, as carefully as possible. The best regulation is self regulation, thats a 5 minute idea but it couldnt be done. I presume alot of lobby money was spent to make sure of that.
The people where this does happen is factory workers and the sort, very often they become creditors to the company they worked for. Ditto anyone with gov pension is a creditor, hoping for fiscal prudence (rare). Anyway its the miners in BTC where this might be a factor in an equation for profitability I guess
Nice tactic
Considering the crowded field, might have been a clever bet to take that.
