That's perfectly understandable. What about the second week of inactivity, which is followed by a bare reaching of the minimum of 15 posts?


Length is not the same with quality. Actually, you are on thin ice here. With a merit vs activity ratio of 0.09 (which means a merit at 10.65 days in average), this is quite the opposite of pure quality. Not to mention the merit vs posts ratio lol. Pure quality posters have at least 0.5 merit vs activity ratio and the real good ones have a ratio bigger than 1.


Most likely, he stays on the Member spot as there wasn't any opening in his Tier for Full Member. If there will be such opening, the spot will be taken either by him or by one of the participants with Full Member rank from Tier B, considering which one is the oldest inside the campaign.

Maybe the rules can be improved somehow, with lightlord's approval? At least a part of them. For example, the rules related to excluding someone from the campaign. As of now there is only 1 rule for that: if you get negative score level 2 from DT. I believe that users should be dropped also for consecutive weeks of receiving the same warning.

Let's take as example the warning for inactivity. As now there isn't any rule for excluding inactive users, let's consider a Tier A inactive user. This user could be excluded after 10 weeks of inactivity! Week 1: first warning; week 2: second warning, this being followed by a demotion to Tier B; week 3: although this is the third consecutive warning, the user receives just a first warning as being his first offense in his new tier; week 4: second warning, followed by a demotion to Tier C; week 5: first warning in his new tier; week 6: second warning, followed by a demotion to Tier D; week 7: first warning in his new tier; week 8: second warning, followed vy a demotion to Tier E; week 9: first warning for his new tier; week 10: second warning, followed by excluding the user from the campaign.

Indeed, it never happened something like this, but it could happen. Look at the examples of AlexSimion and gomariah95 posted by me above, which were excluded after 5 weeks of inactivity. They occupied 2 spots for 5 weeks for nothing, as those spots could be used by other members. And in an extreme case, meaning a Tier A inactive user, this means 10 weeks until he can be excluded based on the actual rules.

Can this be changed and exclude users after 3 consecutive inactivity warnings?

In this case, you should apply following the format from the first page of the topic, not just by only expressing your willing here


Managers tend to accept those which at least read the rules...apparently you didn't bother to do that.

Because of the present situation I'm in, I cannot keep up with the  activity I prefer to drop out of the campaign this will be my last week in the campaign it was a great 20 weeks of campaign in Bitvest I hope I can join the campaign in the future.

I would like to thank CryptopreneurBrainboss for managing this campaign, I am going to miss Bitvest in my signature

Spreadsheet for round 79 has been turned in to lightlord for payment.

Available spots. Tier E, All rank

Note: My DM is always open to any inquiries, complains, observations etc.

Remember,
BrainbossCares❣️

User: Lillominato89
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 102
Address: 12PMhHC4zX5pvMpGVL5vzAe2XFnWGrXvBj

I Will apply the  signature after being accepted.

User: Mikasa77
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 135
Address: (Your BTC Address) 3NX5cH76dp49vcQFuyZ3pTzPoKw9demYn5

I would like to apply to your campaign. Hope to be accepted.

You don't need to worry about the starting post count as all the posts made after 12 PM Sunday Forum time, will be counted in your current week's posts. Also starting post number does not matter much as the manager manually check the posts and count them.

yeah, agree as well, it is simply too long for a member of the campaign that is inactive to be excluded after 10 weeks, no matter what happened, three weeks of inactivity without proper explanation (health issue for example) should be enough for exclusion, if we wait for ten weeks then some good members will left the campaign for something else, and we will stuck with posters that are using the rule and trying to outsmart the campaign

it is called negative selection, and it is not good nowhere, so here is no good as well

User: mezzaluna
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 180
Address: 39Q3thvRRNQ2hDXAPze2bVq5vq8iNV3PEa