That's my point exactly - if they were genuine about removing UID's (by their yard stick of just one month)


then that list should also be excluded...


(I think you missed the point on that one).  

I do get you, I will say in the case of Zepher, he will be back - some RL stuff has got in his way is all.

I thought that being online in the last 3 days was a bit strange too, but within context I had read it as a requirement at the time that theymos updates the list (about once a month), so it would not be an ongoing issue unless it was a status measurement at the time that theymos was taking the snapshot.  Probably a more meaningful measurement would be to require being online at least half of the days of the previous month rather than looking at a potential snapshot of just 3 days.

If I'm theymos,

I will add forms to submit

a) One - day Inactivity Leave (letter)

b) Three - day Sick Inactivity Leave (letter)

c) Yearly Holiday of 15 days, 1 month, 1 year, 2 to few years (letter)

d) Wedding Inactivity leave

e) Accident Inactivity leave with without proof

f) Space Journey leave

g) And many more...

Isn't it hard to tweak to accept absence letters and keep activity level of DT1 and DT2.

Wedding inactivity leave doesn't seem like a default trust issue - it more of a cause for annulment.

It wasn't a general subjective perception of inactivity that I was referring to.
My original point was that it seems, as things stand, that in order to qualify for DT a member must have been active in the 72 hours before the unknown time that Theymos chooses to revise the list in the future.


If a previous member of DT is excluded solely because of that "3 day" rule, then all their presumably valuable feedback becomes default invisible and their place in the interconnections that constitute DT qualifications now also vanishes.
Sometimes people take a short break from online life (maybe not often enough) without becoming inactive long term.

Tl,dr; Unless I have misunderstood, I think Theymos should consider changing that stipulation to something like

An important reminder:

---

I've already contacted shdvb about this and other cases.

I have asked also someone on last day about same issue. I don't think it's really necessary to send positive feedback's for every transaction. Is ther any difference with single positive feedback's and with 10 positive feedback's from same DT ? I don't think so, I am not sure if effect it on trust rating. But I think its better just left single feedback's if you want, especially for positive feedback's.

Use a neutral rating for documentation, don't trust farm with a spam of worthless positive ratings.

If you are not on DT do whatever you want. If you are on DT, and want to remain there, then you have no such right.