I still don't think that an echochamber conveys your message better than well-reasoned thoughts.
chat about it all you want
It's interesting, I might say. (10 posts by 8 users with 5 merit deleted.)
Bit of confirmation bias innit.
bit of bias ya
Despite the narrative you're aiming to push it seems rather unlikely for any real progress to be made, especially since all those that have replied on the thread have a negative DefaultTrust rating.
dt rating does not matter
votes matter
nice try with misinformation
It's not misinformation that I'm spreading. You're trying to get "big players" into your plan. Most users that have earned merit aren't those that have heavy negative trust.
small votes are fine
I believe the real misinformation is pushed by those that are attempting to create a one-sided discussion.
k
we dont need anymore information
we know
If the crux of your beginnings are stemmed in censorship, then what kind of state are you pushing for the new DefaultTrust to become?
this is only one thread
Regardless of the number of threads, adding self-moderation and deleting every new reply that isn't in accordance with your beliefs is blatant censorship.
you are not signature spamming and merit whoring in my thread
you come up with a deal that removes lauda and we will talk to end the war
It just seems like an incontinent display of needless indignance: to resort to absolute control of the thread in a way as to isolate any opposition reduces perceptions to a guaranteed victory.
you are not derailing my thread
Derailing your thread? By adding in a differing opinion?
I suppose that's one way to consider it.
this thread is action
Aren't these ad-hominem attacks, these deletions of dissent, these attacks on differing opinions exactly the kind of thing that you would typically want to avoid when it comes to intelligent discussion?
not a discussion thread
Hey guys anyone can easily understand whats going on here. Its completely against the rules of bitcointalk. You guys are trying to manipulate the whole DT selection system. This subject should be discuss on Meta section & i am going to do it as a forum member.
do it
If the thread is not for discussion then why open it to replies? Perhaps a locked thread would be of more substance, aye?
only users i want in my thread
you are off topic
Then, if you offer only options of discussion to those that you permit, isn't it truly a one-way discussion? After all, if you're conversing with other members, that's a discussion by definition.
this thread is for removing lauda
keeping lauda discussion is off topic
my thread
go open a keep lauda thread
IIf byeolui eavlel otwheadt piofs tIs ttrou lpye rasmi sotf fy-otuo pmiacy tsheeen tmhoed ecroantcolruss isohno uolfd yhoaunrd lcel aiitm..
now you are just trolling
I don't think I'm trolling. Would you like to have the moderators determine the validity of that claim? Just leave this post up.
Any discussion about not removing Lauda from DT is relevant to the removal of Lauda from DT. It's just P and (not) P.
why leave your post up?
discuss keeping lauda in your own thread
this thread is HOW TO REMOVE LAUDA
not if to keep or remove lauda
how to remove
