You are wrong. First of all, anyone can be biased because you know money can always talk. So, it will a bad idea to create a team of trusted members. If those trusted member can't ensure you the safety, what will happen? I think IEO is all way better than anything related fund raising for now.
What if they got paid, perhaps with the cryptocurrency itself. I just don't see why can't we just ALL or.. most of the investors see it clean and transparent as it is and it goes same for politicians, when you have in your hands the future of something people might believe in be it a country or a currency or a person AND your position tends to be seeken by unwanted activists then atleast for a while you should accept a leak in privacy unless you can give proof upfront, like code itself.
I accept to pass the KYC process only when the team members of the project are verified. If I can assure that the project is legit and won't steal my funds, I do not have any problems by passing the full KYC procedure.
They can be hard to distinguish if you don't look well, some are pretty easy to spot indeed and then you got a real shame of graphic designing wasted in some.
I'm saying nothing about KYC from the user sender side
Also, identification and verification can be faked on many sites, thats why in 2nd post if I'm not wrong I were mentioning for more drastical measures I dislike a bit. That's why I think joint cooperation between the community members would be crucial to prevent.