we can barely predict what is going to happen in a year or 10 years from now. you are asking us to predict what will happen after about 90 years! that is simply impossible. not to mention that this topic has been discussed before many many times. example of the most recent duplicate topic: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5128657.0

Yes it is a long way to go, we do not even know if we can see the time when all bitcoin are mined. We also do not know whether all bitcoin can be mined or not as there might be a chance that bitcoin is not even being used anymore before all are mined. Anything may happen in technology, who knows the future? No one obviously.

OP, I believe the "drama" will start after two halvings. There will be some "influencial" people from the community who will start a "campaign" for a hard fork to change the reward schedule, but without inflating the supply.

I will say it now, "I told you so".

That's just one of those things that can happen when there is no bitcoin to mine, the price will no doubt increase But we should  focus on it as well, is it possible for investors to enjoy it? I mean If the price is so High how will it be for new Investor to invest on Uncertain Investment, The Up and Down price on the market let alone the bearish market today, Hopefully, our Dream will come true and it will grow and will not fall when there is no Bitcoin to mine.

Hilarious. No one can predict the values of any cryptocurrency in this extremely volatile market where the values swing upwards and downwards for some reason(No reason sometimes) which is why you asking us to predict something like this is hilarious indeed.

Lets take things one step at a time op.

As of now we cannot find the right time by which the entire sum of bitcoin gets mined. Bitcoin is all about the supply to the demand, when there is very minimal number of bitcoin to be mined there will be increased demand. This will make even a single satoshi more valuable. We're not sure about the future market, but if the need for bitcoin keeps growing same as now there'll be assured growth in value of single satoshi.

I heard other proposals of a hard fork to take Satoshi's Bitcoins, then distributing them to the miners.

Plus who's promoting? I'm ridiculing. Unless it's a bug or something that threatens impending doom for Bitcoin, a hard fork will never get consensus.

There is still many years until all BTC would be mined. For example, till that time someone can invent a new super miner with a huge, for the current moment, hashrate and low electricity consumption.
Miners always work on getting a better equipment and since GPU mining hashrate is constantly growing. For now nothing tells us that this trend should stop.

I still think very optimistic that when bitcoin is fully exploited in 2030, then the price of bitcoin will increase rapidly. Besides bitcoin technology has improved a lot, bitcoin is accepted most of the world, becoming a legitimate payment method. but that's just my optimistic thinking, nobody knows until 2030 bitcoin will become scarce or become worthless.

because LN is a separate network. and BITCOIN was changed to meet LN needs(not the other way round) the same group that instigated hardforks using consensus bypasses in 2017 to make bitcoin LN compatible. will do the same thing again to make the bitcoin units of account more appear to be the same as LN's pegged tokens. to attempt to hide that LN is pegged tokens

learn millisats

with 8 decimals the year 2140~ is the year mining rewards cant be divided. but adding 1000 subunits means that bitcoin can have many more 'bitcoin halving' events beyond 2140
eg 1000, 500,250,125 which is 4 extra NON-Rounded halvings which is 16 years of more units of account bing added to circulation

what you also have to realise is that at code/PROTOCOL level units of account are measured in satoshi's. so messing with the units of account do actually matter. once you look beyond the propaganda hype and buzzwords of human drama and the user interface and look at the code you will realise that the units of account changing from
~2,100,000,000,000,000
~2,100,000,000,000,000,000 matters

yes some people will buzzword it that its still going to be 21m 'bitcoins' . but the reality is a 'bitcoin' is a basket term for 100,000,000 satoshis
much like saying a banana pallet is 1000 banana's. and then saying there are only ever 100 pallets in a truck. yet by adding 10 banana's per pallet and still trying to say there are only 100 pallets, does not hide the fact that there are now 1000 extra banana's that can be shared around