Explain how this is a side issue? this is a directly related incident. This is building a case that your red is not valid unless you are ready to apply red to ALL account sellers.

Nutildah clearly stated account sales are allowing scammers greater possibility of pulling scam. He then either tried to sell or did sell the account. Nobody knows. This is knowingly increasing the probability of scamming on this board.

The initial poster has demonstrated nothing like this level of untrustworthy behavior.

You are simply trying to divert away from an On Topic debate about your red trust.  Explain why you find the nutildah account MORE trustworthy than the initial poster. I await you explanation.  Time past is a cop out.

You are employing double standards to favor your DT pals. That is clear.

I will use this specific case as double standards if you do not explain why you find this members actions more untrustworthy than nutildahs.

You are clearly missing the point.

Trust is about trust. Intention is a large part of this. Red trusting relating to account sales is all on topic. Your reasoning here relating to this entire subject is being examined. Stop trying to push that away by claiming it is off topic.

The nutildah account clearly said that they believed account sales were contributing to scammers gaining trust and were firmly against it in 2014. They were advocating the punishment of account sellers on those grounds. They firmly stated that selling accounts left members vulnerable to scammers.

In 2016 they decided to sell their account believing it would lead to people possibly getting scammed but not caring one shit. It is unknown whether the account sale went through or not.

How can you reason this initial poster is less trust worthy that your lunch time buddy nutildah who knowingly increased the probability of people getting scammed here?  He is by his own reasoning increasing the probability of people getting scammed here?

Please tackle this specific reason. Your reasoning seems unreliable and untrustworthy in itself. You would knowingly be pals with someone by their own reasoning wanted to increase peoples chances of getting scammed here?

Is that right? because that seems to be what you are saying. That to me is the type of reasoning the board should be made vulnerable too.

You had previously seemed semi impartial, this time you are clearly being biased.

You would trust someone who by their own statement would for their own financial gain knowingly increase the risk of people getting scammed here? these people you want to meet for beers?

He probably could in my sent rating history, but that is irrelevant anyway. Nothing he says will influence me to tag you or to remove any other tags.

I knew this question will raise once a day that why bought account will get tag since its allowed by forum itself. Yes I know this is legit question. According to OP he bought account for earn money, not for discussion. And his/her account highlighted due to Yobit spam. OP didn't bought account for discussion on this forum or his/her intention wasn't to contribute something really. We know all this forum has created for discussion about crypto-currency although we are earning good from here. But just buy a account only for earning isn't wise decision in my opinion. Perhaps its excusable is someone buy account for discussion and contributions, then obviously he/she will able to earn from here. Directly joined after bought account means he/she will not contribute anything for forum. He/she just bought account for his/her own need.

If you need earn money then work hard. Don't choose shortcut. Find a job and build your own bitcointalk account by yourself. Once a day you will also able to earn if you build your account successfully.

It's to late for your apology, you always use reference that forum allow account sell. So why you panic now? Forum allow it but community not allow it. Couple of seller and buyer here, it doesn't mean they are the community. That's their profession. Community means total forum, and if you ask open questions then no one will allow to buy account except corrupted user.

Fact that the OP left/decided to leave the forum is another sign that they bought the account only to spam the forum for some quick bucks.
If they wanted to take part in the YoShit campaign (however scammy that may sound) they could have used their own account to do so - it does not take much to be a contributory member of the forum and posting for the signature at the same time.

Liberalism speaking for them should drown themselves in more mind-altering drugs if they think buying accounts is something good for the forum after it had been considered as untrustworthy. Kids these days forget about the hard work their elders did for them and that they also need to go through the same if they wish to attain the top ranks of this forum.

Stubbornness at its peak in this thread, people keep forgetting that unfair means to something big are considered as cheating. Yet they will consider themselves as abused when punished for the same. MEH.

So how does it come you didn't have tagged thephamacist who posted tons of racist shitposts for money ?He openly admitted doing so for money.
How does it come he has no red tagg from you since he was clearly using an alt account and would never admit it wouldn't he catched by another member doing so ?


You say beh to one user for doing so but don't say beh to a DT member who did the same ?

You are clearly pathethic which i could already see on your given trust feedbacks.

Every account seller and  buyer should be tagged and there is nothing wrong here, the wrong thing is when DT continue to give negatives even when you have proved that you have abandoned all bought accounts and use only one. This shows the non good will of DT members and that is the reason many members are leaving, even good members, no one cares about a spammer but this forum is like a tomb where I only read DT members replying to each other. Probably this was not what Satoshi designed this forum for in the first place.

Qs- well i would say it accomplished one thing the account was believed to have switched hands 4 or more times. Stated by the current owner; it won't be doing that anymore.

You're right that anyone engaging in this behaviour will need to go to greater lengths to avoid detection. It's the same for anyone trying to circumvent  "rules" or expectations. This does however make it less desirable to hack accounts for the purpose of selling them; which i would say is a net positive.

This member only contacted the seller for the required account recovery proof when they thought they may need to go through that process. Tells me that this may have come from an account farmer or someone who buys and sells a lot of accounts. Maybe this person now goes and spreads the word of how easily you can lose your investment and that maybe this forum isn't some cash cow to be milked. I would also consider thai a net positive.

I never intend to provide a false sense of security. Dealing over the internet one should not feel "safe" it leads to poor decisions. Anyone i've made feel that way through my actions should continue to research on their own; my feedback is for me and those that see value in it. Atriz was a fucked up situation but I'm not completely familiar with their past before the scammy bounty issue; nor am i concerned with that right now. They have sufficient warnings associated with them.

To your final point no one knows what OP would have done apart from spam the forum for money, and contribute nothing in the process. Spending 200 while supposedly broke and unable to feed 3 kids seems unlikely to me. So no one knows what they would have really done. Either way they can chose to participate in this forum, all i did was take away the guarantee of easy yobit money, which would have gotten them a ban anyways.

-Thule 
Tag them if you want. I see it as a service to the community and am thankful for how that was handled. The account is currently held in trust, not sold. I can't recall all the details but i believe suchmoon gave Bruno a donation/loan and then asked to lock the account by changing the password. All done to prevent the account being sold. It was done transparently as well. I also believe that all of Bruno's accounts were tagged.

On mobile replies are going to be sporadic.

Buying an account with the sole purpose of joining a signature campaign and (most likely) spam this forum with nonsense is well deserved of a neg. All imo ofc.