"well bitcoins Divisible down to 8 decimal places and if needed we can add more via censuses of the network"
When private cooperation`s or bankers or governments or groups own 51% or the network it is not decentralized and you will have no say.  China already owns 81% of the hashing power btw.

and sure... but it is still not fairly distributed, also you will be adding more and more decimal places and lower and lower tx fees until the day you die. To the point where miners will not mine to support the network and there will not be one.

The tax fees should also be going to support projects, like clean water, food, shelter and space exploration and "governments" aka US THE PEOPLE (that we all vote on where the money goes). Not to run a network that uses more energy than Ireland and soon to be more than Canada in the next 10 years.

I agree, fiat needs to go and sure bitcoin is better in some aspects, but also has the flaw in the end game like gold has with bitcoin (WATCH THE SIMULATION) I played in it and killed the AI king twice who was basically using aimbot). It becomes like a game of jenga where the bottom keeps giving to the top and eventually collapses, the bottom has no way to reforge the resources, or like a slinky where the bottom pulls the top so hard down they fall another step and we all end up on the ground.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4B1ZfL5LA8 (in the end no matter what you do, if the bottom is not getting new pieces it falls, it always ends the same)

In a time/duration dispensing system, the bottom constantly gets reinforced and the tower at the top will not fall.

The trickle-up effect, ever watch a volcano create land? There is a reason that land does not fall back into the ocean, like Hawaii, it is only because the water level is rising does it appear to be falling, but if the water level never rises, the land does not sink.  

We need the gold to go to space anyways so we can`t use that and we need the power usage of the bitcoin network to be useful.

Well one thing is for sure, if we go back to the gold standard, there is not enough gold in the entire galaxy just to pay back Canada`s debt or the USA, just to get out of debt for America. That is 1,057,692,307.6875 Pounds. Where you going to put that?

To buy a coffee I need to spend more bitcoin in the transaction fee than the coffee is worth itself and wait 10 minutes(more like 30mins-2 hours in reality), that is impractical already.

If there was ever a shift back to the gold standard it would result in a complete re-wiring of the system, per say. If I remember correctly it was Saddam who was thinking about breaking the petrodollar and getting his country back to a gold standard, which would completely break fiat economics. That part is kind of irrelevant, but worth noting for the context.

Countries that develop a gold (or alternatively-back currency) would likely be able to pay for their debts by having the currency valued insanely high, as a currency with a backing commodity is more valuable than fiat. It could also make the price of gold (in fiat) skyrocket to the point where it is valuable enough to pay debts. It's easier to default on the debt and then make the transition, though, so chances are no country would try to shuffle into a backed currency while they still have substantial debt.

The point of debt in the fiat system is to literally "create" money and enter an infinite cycle where everyone has to work to try and beat inflation, but absolutely never can. Backed currencies would force a country to not make full-moron expenditures on unnecessary programs. Meaning; it forces fiscal conservatism. Some people won't like that.

The only problem with "backing" is the trust in the backer. You can have a "gold standard", and assume everyone isn't going to change their banknotes for gold at the same time... Then you get a repeat of the fractional reserve system again. In fact, it could be that countries like the USA were so deep in that already that dropping it was the safest thing to do (before somehow all Americans decided to demand their gold).

While money backed with "something" sounds almost like its that something, it isn't. A gold dollar coin is not the same as a dollar that represents an amount of gold equal to the same gold dollar coin. Even if you have trust, its still a promise you have to fulfill, and humans being humans, or human institutions, or governments, politicians, whatever, could come the day they don't fulfill it and plummets the price, just like a bankrun. (Or the legislative declares that the gold standard is now void).

When the Austrians wanted gold as money, they meant actual gold coins or ingots, anything you could melt at anytime and you don't have to trust that "someone" will give it to you when you request it (the same promise a bank does to you when you make a deposit).

So even if you say, that money is backed with gold, I'm not going to trust it the same as if it was gold itself. So its rather pointless.

wait so how do we pay back the debt? if in order to pay it back new money which creates more debt must be created.... (like bitcoin dust, old paper bills and loose change have ended up rotting away) so even if you took all the money in circulation you still would not have enough to pay back every dollar, even if we sold all stocks, goods and services you still would not have enough.

sure you got good returns in bitcoin, but that does not mean anything, how does bitcoin undo centuries worth of inflation of debt, it is measured in fiat... well to me 1bitcoin=1bitcoin but to most 1btc = $5,500 USD.

Now, Timed Currency and duration backed money, if were convertible to food, could pay it back.

Time tokens would be of little more use than the currency we have. In fact, it's probably a better form of tallying value, and simpler. Imagine having to pay a certain amount of seconds or minutes for produce at the store, which directly correlates to your life. Plus, how would you manage the fact that people have varying life spans? You'd end up pricing things based on a predicted lifespan, but if it's cut short for (reasons), suddenly everything's scuffed in the economic system.

Now, if there was a way to convert these time tokens into an actual lifespan extension, like that movie "In Time", then maybe you have something going for you. But that's way beyond our current technological prowess.
[/quote]

The time/duration tokens create equal distribution.
The time/duration tokens stop centralized banks(family's) creating money and create a decentralized medium of obtaining money.
The time/duration create the supply in which no one is in debt to it.
The tax fees from collecting duration will fund space programs, food, water and shelter and the decentralized government itself.
Active voters will be doing a job, which will make them more than base wage, they would get workforce base wage.
People enterprising or businesses could earn even more for trading goods and services.

Life span in a non factor, sure some people get less time than others on this planet, but you will still earn it at the same rate of "base wage or base time" kind of like minimum wage.
Which could either be 1 token every 1 hour or 1 hour itself if you`d like to look it in that way.

I could sell produce for 1 token, which represents 1 hour that you obtained from incremental duration being expended into your unique digital passport/address or from your enterprising earnings.
I could sell you 10 apples for 1 token which represents 1 hour or 1 apple for .1 of a token which represents 1/10th of a hour.

I been going to the market since I was a kid, I am a farmer, I could charge you 2 hours if I wanted for 10 apples or charge you 3 hours for 10 apples, whatever I want, That is up to the seller to decide and the buyer to agree upon or not buy, just like how I could charge you 10$ or 15$. Just like mcdonalds charges $2.50 for a mcdouble, they can charge whatever they want.

(e.g. if the average hourly rate is 1 token, then a commodity valued at 1 token in the national currency(time/duration) would be equivalent to 1 hour).

I mean just some ideas. I don`t have any system created to do this, but It is possible with tech we have today. I am not a programmer, I am a farmer and pro gamer, top 100 in starcraft2, top 10 in overwatch, top 2 in planetary annihilation, top 1 in heroes of the storm, top 1 in pubg first person solo`s, top 1 huntercoin king killer. I look at the economy as a game now and everything.

my bars, first song I ever made lol, sorry I am white boy I got no flow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrWeGm4KDBM

anyhow back to fixing this $cam $lavery $ystem

Caveman Economics  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_SVexaSMwk

This is a pretty good system because at the end when we all go to collect our clams the bankers will not have any balls left to reproduce their genes into the pool.

Well they should own 1/3rd of the hashing power, if we are going by populations and that is how hashing power should be divided between governments in the new system.
but 81% is a little nutty. Imagine if they united into one pool.