Could I get a response for a miner who understands what I am talking about please?
Nobody understands what you're talking about because you're basing your conclusions on too many assumptions.
BSV will implement gigabyte blocks in July, by then the mining reward will actually be less than the fees collected by the miners at that scale.
You're assuming that SV's blocks will be full by then. Currently, the average BSV block size is 153 KB. That's 0.12% of its max capacity of 128 MB. What good is raising the block size limit to 1 GB going to do when you're having such trouble filling its current blocks?
You see where Im getting started? Time will tell, ive said all Ive need to here.
That would be fine but somehow I doubt its true. I welcome honest debate. However, you're not being honest with your calculations thus far.
Miners are NOT second rate citizens in this capitalist economic model. Lightning Network damn well wont save you. Raise the blocks or get everyones BTC on the lightning Network.
Bitcoin and Lightning are doing just fine, thanks for your concern.
You have now 1 month until 1 GIG blocks are implemented, and with OP return and all these applications being built on the OG protocol of BSV, its in the networks best interest to spam as many transactions as possible through as many applications as possible built on top of the original protocol (BSV)
That's like building a super-sized Wal-Mart in the middle of the desert. Have at it, it's not my money.
A super computer that powerful with that much hashpower can destroy all the other blockchains.
With its relatively piddly hash rate BSV will fall to this problem well before BTC.
Time to understand the facts. I really, god honestly believe none of you guys understand Bitcoin.
You don't understand the difference between an original protocol and a fork. You should probably take the time to learn that difference before you start giving lectures.
