John McAfee was right, yes, we should use it as intended and in fact I am using it and holding some bitcoins at the same time.
It's not hard, when we use it, we contribute for its growth but we should also be futuristic and see in the future that more users than investors will be here in the market, and as adoption grow, it cannot be denied that it will excite us since the value of bitcoin will follow.

It's not only the speculators at fault in here but also the lack of places and platforms in which we can use our cryptocurrencies. It's as if crypto is specifically made for speculation and not as a medium of exchange per se due to the fact that there are more exchanges available compared to the number of merchants accepting bitcoin fully, which, to me is a ridiculoudly small number given the amount of growth bitcoin has seen in its almost 10 years of existence.

People will value the deflationary side of bitcoin than using it to actually buy something, and other people will do the same causing a stagnation in the economy and a completely new purpose for bitcoin: wealth generator and not cryptocurrency.

Government can work with the price being so high of bitcoin,the only problem we will face if bitcoin will be use as currnency in our financial system is the fees,fees is the thing that makes our face crooked when doing an transaction.Fees are so high that it sometimes to the point that fees are higher than the amount we send (microtransactions).Thats the hard part we will face not the price.

It's just the usual bitcoin as money vs store of value (SoV). Even in our community this have been a long standing debate. So the only answer for this one is how are you going to treat bitcoin yourself, what advantage can you make out of it. If you are a investor and wanted to hold on it because of the chance that the price could literally go to 6 figures or 7 figures in the next couple of years then good. On the other hand, there are also majority who uses it as sound money so this is a open-ended debate and we won't have the exact answer for this.

They are conflicting ideologies, but like I said, there's no right or wrong answer. Neither side should be shaming the other, because what people want to do with their own money is their business. The industry has thrived with people doing exactly what they're doing now, so there's no real immediate problem to solve.

The issue of lack of use should resolve itself eventually as Bitcoin becomes more convenient to spend. People routinely spend for convenience (like how piracy is plummeting because Netflix and Spotify are convenient), and I foresee the same thing happening with Bitcoin. There are several developments on this front, like lightweight Lightning wallets, Bitcoin being accepted for bills payment, etc., so things are only going to get better from here. It's going to happen organically even without some people's holier than thou preachings.

The fact  is, we can do both spending and holding.  Just like we do with our money.  We spend majority of it to fill our obligation and save some of it for our future use.  Same case can be done with Bitcoin, the difference is Fiat currency is destined to devaluate overtime while Bitcoin  value in the future is unknown because of the factors like speculation, adoption and many more.  We can think it can be 1m in the next few years but there is also a possiblity that it can be less than $1000. 

Stagnant water stinks because of lack of flow. There is a theorem of use and disuse in science, wherein the part of the body that is frequently been used tends to be bigger than the unused part. So using currency gives it more value and attracts more users to trade it. Nevertheless, never get out of stock, save for the raining day.

Even though others here are saying that cryptocurrency can be treated as a real currency, that would be really hard because of its very high price. If we want it to compete with fiat we have to treat crypto as fiat where we should also spend our money and we should hold some of it. Holding and holding won't do anything good in this ecosystem. Now, it is very ironic that we want to treat as something as fiat where some of us just want money from it.

Many will say that the subscription system is an outdated model. The RSS is no longer working, although in the olden days it made it possible very convenient to save the most awesome articles. I am not a fan of social networks like Twitter, where most people are young people. And I prefer to work with the site directly. So I like the Taklimakan news feed. They select the most important articles from large cryptocurrency news sites and allow you to make a selected subscription. And in combination with access to trading strategies, this makes it possible to form a holistic view of the market situation.