Livecoin's ToS was a PoS. I know that much.

He threatened livecoin with what? Creating a thread in BTT? How is that a threat unless you have something to be afraid of?

Locking his account was a mistake.

If I were Livecoin, I wouldn't lock hiS account, let him withdraw whatever funds he has there but I also wouldn't buy any mona coins from the market just to pay him since the missing shitcoins weren't livecoin's fault.

At the moment, izooomrud account is fully unblocked. He can withdraw or sell his funds. Concerning the situation with MONA, we posted news with detailed explanations following this link - https://www.livecoin.net/en/news/view/261
We are unable to bear more responsibility for an asset, than its developer. It is stated in the User agreement, which a user either accepts at signing up, or doesn't use our Service at all. The fact, that izooomrud used our Service, suggests that he agreed to this clause, saying the following:


Besides alleged theft accusations, this user also made threats against us. His charges have no grounds at all and breach the User agreement rules, which the user accepted at registration, and that leads to the account shut-down.

Do use your had:

Translation:

You don't see it, because you don't use your had.

Obviously because OP said that even lying is not against ToS (which has been brought up by livecoin), everything OP says is a lie. 

If i were you, i wouldn't bother to argue with those people defending livecoin.
Anyone who doesn't accept that their ToS is illegal and their legal status is somewhat unknown either doesn't want to accept it or simply is delusional.

Fixed your mistakes.

And to answer your question.. well this could be seen as a threat. But a justified one.
"If you don't return my money, i tell the truth about you" is a threat. But this doesn't make it a 'bad one'.




What is stuped ? Is this something to eat ?

@izooomrud, hope your withdrawal is already confirmed?
I advice you not use an exchange site which couldnt give their users what they require (respect, sound support and active with their platform) cause they ought to have disable the coin (Mona) before you bought it.

Looks a great initiative to end the drama, or at least help things cool down.
One more thing: I think you should claim that a new signature campaign run by @Livecoin Manager (just assume it is a new one from Livecoin) is an official campaign from Livecoin. There is drama that it is run by scammers, whom are not from Livecoin team. I don't think Livecoin exchange need another drama.

I have already talked about this before

It'll add another problem in their menu just so they didn't come ahead and tell us about it. I was skeptical about being a member of their new campaign (was accepted but deleted my application after knowing that they've got the real reds from many users here) and ofc, no confirmation about the campaign from Livecoin's Officials. If it ends like that 'where there's a one week shout by the participants who didn't leave yet and they don't get paid a damn Satoshi out of it', their efforts to save livecoin 'just because they believe they are going to make some big fat amounts' will go waters. Let's see if that 'Livecoin Manager' sums it up to paying them for real or these guys are going to kill their chances of getting accepted in future campaigns of many managers for their behavior.