Nope. Peter is one of the most stubborn people I've ever seen, and he genuinely believes everything he says about gold and Bitcoin. There's no changing his mind. But some of his fans might be persuaded, so I'm glad to see the debate happening.

yeah everyone is excited to see the debate

the only thing good about this debate in my opinion is that it has the potential of introducing bitcoin to many viewers. otherwise i personally dislike such comparisons since bitcoin and gold are very different from each other. while bitcoin is purely a currency that should be used as a medium of exchange, gold has lots that attribute a long time ago and now it i more of a valuable object than a medium of exchange.
investment-wise they are still uncomparable since bitcoin is new and growing, while gold has thousands of years of history.

It's not going to be an easy debate because convincing Peter Schiff about bitcoin as another gold if I should put it that way will be an uphill task, but I look forward to the outcome of the debate.

This will be a great debate and I will be keeping an eye on it. Gold lovers will never ever change their views , as they think that s the best ever investments . Even most governments think so and have huge reserve of gold incase of any collapse.

It will be very hard to change Peter's opinion.

oh no the pump guy to debate him? I had to block that guy on twitter, shit is annoying always talking about the price of fiat. I think Pompliano is a fiat lover.

Let me debate him.

1) They confiscated all the gold before, you should know Peter Schiff you are a gold bug.  Executive Order 6102 (they can`t take your password from your brain,yet)
2) Gold cannot be transported across the world in milliseconds, and when we become a multi planetary species, across space in milliseconds.
3) We need the Gold for electronics not a currency, for if we use it as a money supply we will check mate ourselves onto this planet, it is needed for the computers and spaceships to expand our race further into space.
4) Bitcoin is more divisible, if gold were to replace fiat, we would not even be able to see how much gold we trade for 1 apple, it would be impossible to measure.
5) We know the supply of bitcoin, what happens if we find a planet full of gold?
6) We are literally destroying mountains for a little bit of gold, We are pouring chemicals (Mercury) in the mountains just to break down the gold. I literally went to B.C/Yukon last year it is sick what they are doing to the land.

One pro for gold is, it is written in the Constitution that all debts must be paid back in gold, but the founding fathers had no clue WTF computers were at the time, let alone blockchain, we live in a new age, The Digital Age.

Anyways really it should be a debate about Gold and Bitcoin both being better than FIAT and why goverment/private banking family money is a $cam and $lavery.  

Another debate I would school both these guys in, is TIME and DURATION being better than all of this shit bitcoin, fiat and gold. FOR WE ALL WORK FOR IT ALREADY and it is the only way to have fair distribution in a currency.