@GREEDYJOHN
Your gusto is appreciated, but it would be good if you could drop in the discord and communicate further with the current team on your ideas.As I communicated to you in PM, keeping with the ideological notion purity is important, as is staying in line with regulatory standards. Crave began with No ICO, Pre-mine, or block portions attributed towards development funding. But at the same time, the project has been abandoned by previous teams/ Devs, and now has a new team from the community. The team is trying to grow the team, and proceed forth with developments. The reality is , with no development funds available, the team members have been funding the project, and have all been volunteers. Some support has come from others in the community as well, be it funding, providing knowledge, experience, or other means of support. Proposals are planned to be put forth to gain access to funding through the MN governance system. But because that source must come from the voting of solely MN holders, it remains to be seen if the MN holders will get behind the proposals. Currently almost half the coin supply is held by the top 25 wallets. If those top 25 wallets are held by the same persons or those top 25 wallets, or even a majority holder of MN decides too, the person(s) can submit their own proposals and vote on them and exploit the governance system and take those funds for whatever purpose, even if its not in any way towards the further development of the project. There are definitely positive aspects to having a MN system. But there are the downsides to funding development that is solely based on the governance of a MN model. In many cases it seems to work, as long as the majority of MN holders are supportive of proposals or MN are somewhat distributed among many users who create a bit of diversity and more likely balanced voting. Projects trying to evolve will severely struggle without some type of funding. Even if every person volunteered with technical support, there will be costs to some degree. So it may be that a portion of block rewards may need to be apportioned towards developments. There are chains that are doing this in a balanced way and also taking into account regulatory guides, and purity as it relates to the ideology of what Cryptos originally stands for, which is Freedom & Sovereignty over ones life. As a community driven project, these are some topics of discussion, and all input and feedback is valued.
Thanks,
DRC
I would love to join the discord, but I am just too busy right now (I am always tired from work). However, I am happy to fund the revival of old CRAVE block-chains, if anybody can provide useful material.
