The article indeed mentions some strong criticism of Libra like risks of a lot of personal information being abused and a weird nature of uniting what Bitcoin has with regulations.
Hell, even without Libra deployed on the line, Facebook Inc. has already risked a lot of personal information in the open. With the said crypto being deployed and the frenzy of cryptocurrencies becoming so evident to the masses, Facebook's Libra is just a ticking time-bomb waiting to explode, and the fuse would be ignited by of course, the relentless pursuit of people wanting to get into the craze and letting greed take them over, thinking that Libra is x times better than bitcoin.
First, he observed what he saw as a general failure of cryptocurrency. "Payment systems need to protect users against fraud," wrote Kocher. "Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have fared badly in this regard, resulting in numerous major thefts."
I am not sure whether this point is real, though. I mean, cash gets stolen all the time, and banks get robbed as well as sometimes turn out to be the to robbers. Is it really happening way more with cryptos?
Point is, once funds are stolen in cryptocurrencies, the trail is hazy and there's little to no chance of getting it back due to its nature of being irreversible and harder to track unlike cold, hard cash.